luis321 Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 hi i downloaded the new vice city 2004 mod off this site and played right up to the diaz mission and the racket takeover and the game was identical apart from new text telling new things were available but when i went to see them they wernt there any ideas on what went wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luis321 Posted September 7, 2007 Author Share Posted September 7, 2007 doh i put the file in the box have sorted it now and it was well worth the effort coz its a great mod and gives you a whole new game to play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanoutlaw Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 Where did you find the mod? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luis321 Posted September 16, 2007 Author Share Posted September 16, 2007 its on this site in the downloads section its in the mission scripts bit and is great if u have any trouble installing it let me know its easy when youve done it once its called new vice city 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rohan265 Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 hi there. I have a problem with my new vice city 2004. I have played many missions and completed 40% of the game. but when i try to load a saved game, the game shuts down and shows a error. what is the problem?is the file corrupt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Dbl-Gee Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 hi there.I have a problem with my new vice city 2004. I have played many missions and completed 40% of the game. but when i try to load a saved game, the game shuts down and shows a error. what is the problem?is the file corrupt? Sorry but you bumbed a really old topic but anyway you must start new game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markmartir Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 This mod has many crashes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AIR Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 This mod has many crashes DUDE STOP BUMPING MEGA OLD TOPICS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustADummy Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 (edited) First, yeah it's a bump because he didn't say anything useful Second, no need to caps. Third, just report the post and shut up. (Gerard if you see this topic, I'm not telling you what to do ) Edited March 31, 2008 by Jake-da-Spider Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AIR Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 First, yeah it's a bump because he didn't say anything usefulSecond, no need to caps. Third, just report the post and shut up. (Gerard if you see this topic, I'm not telling you what to do ) Dont tell me to shut up, im fed up with people bumping old topics from two months ago and yes there was a need for caps. Post reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSanityHD Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 ^ Your new Air. Joined: 10th Mar 08. How can you be "fed up" of people bumping topics here, you've not been here long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerard Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 1) 16th March 2008 is not two months ago.. it's two weeks ago. And its in a smaller subforum. And its mostly relevant. Therefore it isn't a bump. 2) The "bump" was made by rohan265 from Sept 07 to March 08 - but that was a relevant reply and in a small subforum, so it wasn't a bump. 3) No, there is no need for caps, it's just rude. Use it to emphasise ONE word if you really need to. 4) Jake was right - If you find a bumped topic, don't reply. If you do, you are endorsing the bump and going off-topic, which is spamming. Just report it, and a staff member will look at it and make a decision. Jake - You were telling other members what to do, which is helpful so long as you remain polite. It's when people start acting like moderators by saying "topic closed" or "give him a warning" that is misleading and gets annoying. The reason we say that is that you may not be right - you might think a topic needs to be closed, but the Staff realise it doesn't have to be - if someone has wrongly said "topic closed" then people might think they can't reply there anymore. AIR - You obviously need a lesson on what a bump is. When someone replies to a very old topic (several months or more) with something not-very-useful, especially if it unnecessarily bumps the topic up to the top of the forum list in active subforums, then it is bumping. If it is in a nearly-empty subforum (eg Sunting), it is more relaxed because it doesn't bump up very far, and it doesn't cause disruption. If it is in an active subforum (eg GTA IV) then it causes more disruption, and we'll only allow it if it is an important reply. Replies in Pinned topics do not ever count as bumps. One of the original reasons we don't allow bumping is to stop people constantly bringing their topic up to the top so that people will look at it. For example, if someone asked a question about their game not working, and they replied every week (double post or not) so that more people see the topic, that is tantamount to spamming and is not allowed. In almost ALL circumstances, it is better to reply to an existing topic than make a new one exactly the same. For example, if you are discussing a specific mod, all discussion about that mod could stay in that topic, so that it can easily be found. If it has been a year since the last person posted about that mod, but you have something useful to add (eg the mod is back in development, or there is a version 2) then it is fine to reply. Replying with "lol me too" or "I agree", or a reply in an opinion topic (what's your favourite ___ ) isn't necessary and counts as bumping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts