Franswurst Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I don't know if any of you would be willing to do this, but I really need the picture below to be rendered, so basically just get rid of the black background so I purely have the Age of Orton graphic with the mask and all. And that I can then use that Render either to change it, or just to use like that on say the forums. I really just need it rendered, the rest I can do myself: Already a great big thanks in advance to anyone who would do this for me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrLlamaLlama Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 It's a png file, so a transparent background will be on instead of the black one you see. Quality will be poor on a white background, but fine on anything above 40 or 50% grey. Enjoi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franswurst Posted January 29, 2009 Author Share Posted January 29, 2009 Thanks a lot mate, really appreciate it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 .... That isn't called rendering.... That is cutting out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franswurst Posted January 29, 2009 Author Share Posted January 29, 2009 .... That isn't called rendering.... That is cutting out. Is it? I thought rendering was when you take a pic, or graphic and remove the background and stuff. Don't you call something a render when its just a certain object, person, or graphic taken out of a different image? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOXIC Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 (edited) Well, in this case as you mentioned in the first post, it will serve as a stock for you. Off topic : You've used it in your sig, its a bit larger than allowed AFA I know [maximum allowed is 500 x 200]. Edited January 30, 2009 by TOXIC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damjan Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Don't remind him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franswurst Posted January 30, 2009 Author Share Posted January 30, 2009 Right, forgot that its 200, and not 300 here. I'll change that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 .... That isn't called rendering.... That is cutting out. Is it? I thought rendering was when you take a pic, or graphic and remove the background and stuff. Don't you call something a render when its just a certain object, person, or graphic taken out of a different image? Actually, no. That's a common misconception. Rendering is when the machine produces/creates an image or something in the image. In Photoshop, rendering takes place when applying any filter. However, where the confusion probably comes from is the term "render", in the sense of a 3D image. When you turn your 3D model into a 2D image, that's called rendering. And there are "renders" of video game characters all over the web((they aren't promotional art or screenshots, just the character modeled and posed, then rendered)). People would cut out these renders, and say they had a "render". Apparently the process of cutting out the character became known as "rendering". Hopefully I didn't go to far on that description. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrLlamaLlama Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 ^ Or if you compile, say, a series of video clips in some editing software into a standard, readable file, it's rendering. You can also render someone unable to move, if you... drug them or something. Works with nouns, too. 'When I slammed my pencil onto the table, the lead broke off, rendering it useless.' etc, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 Pretty much "to make/produce/effect/etc.".... So really, in this instance, the correct usage of "render" would be, "To render the image backgroundless"..... Only, backgroundless isn't a word >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franswurst Posted January 31, 2009 Author Share Posted January 31, 2009 .... That isn't called rendering.... That is cutting out. Is it? I thought rendering was when you take a pic, or graphic and remove the background and stuff. Don't you call something a render when its just a certain object, person, or graphic taken out of a different image? Actually, no. That's a common misconception. Rendering is when the machine produces/creates an image or something in the image. In Photoshop, rendering takes place when applying any filter. However, where the confusion probably comes from is the term "render", in the sense of a 3D image. When you turn your 3D model into a 2D image, that's called rendering. And there are "renders" of video game characters all over the web((they aren't promotional art or screenshots, just the character modeled and posed, then rendered)). People would cut out these renders, and say they had a "render". Apparently the process of cutting out the character became known as "rendering". Hopefully I didn't go to far on that description. Actually that's a very nice explanation, that's why I said rendering since I was thinking it would be called a render so I thought to get it it would be called rendering, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 Well, I'm glad we were able to learnz you more knowledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now