orion7198 Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 Sooooo I'm considering getting this desktop and have it be just my gaming/ downloading computer, it seems pretty damn decent, through Craigslist, just wanna know if the specs are high enough to run GTA IV without any major problems, ya know, dedicated video RAM and processor speeds, RAM itself all that. I'll copy paste the specs for y'all uber geeks here (I'm not hatin, I'm an uber nerd.. HP Desktop PC, AMD Phenom QuadCore Processor didn't realize I can't paste into forum topic, so I'll put what is really needed to make a guess.... 500 gig hard drive, 4 gig ram Windows Vista 64 bit, Video card, AMD Radeon, 4200 with DVI, VGA connection Dual-channel Crucial 4GB DDR3-1333 Memory support: Four DIMM sockets, designed to support up to 16GB of DDR3 SDRAM memory, delivering greater platform performance and flexible memory support. Sound Card: 8 channel high-definition high quality-audio Gigabit Ethernet Controller - Network Interface 10/100/1000 Base T network interface LAN Chipset Integrated Just curious if this would have no issues running GTA IV smoothly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted July 15, 2012 Share Posted July 15, 2012 It'll run it but it won't be that smooth. Upgrade it to a 64bit version of Windows 7 and buy a new graphics card and it'll be much better. That video card is at a low-end model and you're gonna have to use very low settings to be able to play IV smoothly. You need a High End GPU to play smoothly. Preferably one with a score of at least 2000 on that chart if you can afford it. 4GB of RAM will probably be enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huckleberry Pie Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 And go for an Nvidia. A GT240 might do at the very least, but I'd go for a 560Ti or one of them mid-range 600-series cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackListedB Posted July 16, 2012 Share Posted July 16, 2012 Chris, he said Vista 64 bit, if you updated with Service Packs, it will remedy any early Vista issues, Vista is not the blight it once was. As far as AMD versus Intel though, Intel still blows them away, even multiple cores versus lesser Intel product. The Core2 is a winner and has remained a strong basis since it's release. AMD is actually dropping competition against Intel as far as CPUs go, but will continue ATI versus nVidia GPU battles As far as the 64bit, the biggest gain is more RAM, the sky's the limit, but not all CPU cores are used, as mentioned elsewhere, GPU is pretty important, if it's the mainboard you're worried about, make sure you can get the latest revision in slots, PCI Express 3.0 will eventually become PCIe 4.0, don't doubt THAT for an instant. It will take a year or two, but it's in the skunk works I read Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartiniFK Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 (edited) That video card is at a low-end model and you're gonna have to use very low settings to be able to play IV smoothly. Edited July 17, 2012 by MartiniFK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackListedB Posted July 17, 2012 Share Posted July 17, 2012 My first PCIe upgrade, from an X300 with 128MB to start off with, was the 9400GT, something similar, if not that exact card, I still have it, but it's not meant for gaming, I got suckered into thinking HIGHER model number, newer card, it must be better for gaming then anything previous, the REAL manner of thinking suggests as far as nVidia, any 7, 8, 9 series card or similar, if it's lower within that range, if it lacks ULTRA or GTX, it's a budget card in some respect, so always look for the last HIGHEST number for a series to get all the features of that series card, it's a good rule of thumb. If the memory is 1GB or more, it's crippled by a small memory interface, which acts like the gate or BUS in relegating traffic of data at any given time it's needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huckleberry Pie Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 My first PCIe upgrade, from an X300 with 128MB to start off with, was the 9400GT, something similar, if not that exact card, I still have it, but it's not meant for gaming, I got suckered into thinking HIGHER model number, newer card, it must be better for gaming then anything previous, the REAL manner of thinking suggests as far as nVidia, any 7, 8, 9 series card or similar, if it's lower within that range, if it lacks ULTRA or GTX, it's a budget card in some respect, so always look for the last HIGHEST number for a series to get all the features of that series card, it's a good rule of thumb. If the memory is 1GB or more, it's crippled by a small memory interface, which acts like the gate or BUS in relegating traffic of data at any given time it's needed On a newer series Nvidia, anything with the second digit that's higher than 4 is a mid-range to high-end card, i.e. GT440 or something like that. And yeah, the GTX designation gives way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackListedB Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 (edited) The new numbering system, availability and pricing play a part in what you usually compare and consider, but it's tricky, best bet is always a magazine article where the card is benchmarked on some apps and games, and pitted against other cards. I bought an 1156 system on a budget, still expected an upgrade path... everyone knows what happened there, it's been crippled and closed off from upgrades as the CPU morphed to 2nd and 3rd generations. http://www.google.co...iw=1010&bih=563 I bought an ATI Radeon HD5450, from reads I did, an even older HD card was getting good press for it's gaming capacity, makes me wonder if perhaps the HD 5450 leap-frogged over some other actual gaming contenders or if you should look solely at 6 or 7xxx series? http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-5450,2549.html Edited July 20, 2012 by BlackListedB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackListedB Posted September 17, 2012 Share Posted September 17, 2012 (edited) I got this link on HP or eMachine Intel boards, where an OEM uses a board specifically made by Intel in this example, Windows 7 and 8 support is just not there, in which case, try and merge XP or Vista drivers, obviously paying attention to bit versions.... http://downloadcente...oadType=Drivers Speaking about the model numbers, for nVidia, it's a good guide on the last two digits of the card designation, then you have a worthy GAMING in 3D graphics model, even if goes as far back as a 6 or 7 series GeForce. Remember, the first two define more of the series card they call into, and 6 series nVidia are the first to cover Shader Model 3, we've since surpassed. You also want a card supporting 9 series Direct X API, and now, covering PCIexpress models 1, 2, or 3 if possible. In the future, a PCI express version 4 will also be an option for gaming, the advantage with these is more throughput bandwidth at the connection of card to motherboard. My cards I have for PCIe 1.0 are the Palit 8600GT pair I bought, these are worthy gaming cards for that generation of motherboard, but if on a budget, there is an 8800GT card, the best one of the era would be an Ultra series perhaps, or of course, anything labeled GTX from nVidia! Edited September 17, 2012 by BlackListedB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now