Spaz The Great

Man, forgot all about this. Wonder if he did at least get a blowjob.

HA, I saw on the news about a lady who had a Corvette, original owner, since the 70's. It had like over a million miles or something. She says all she does is take it to the mechanic when something seems wrong and it still looks brand new.

They pay for webmasters to fly out, tell them not to "leak the secret information", the webmasters are arrogant and do it anyways, more people interested in product, more sales. Duh.

I looked that shit up, and it said progressive rock was also called art rock. Something about Bob Dylan, The Beatles, The Who, and King Crimson. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_rock I don't know that genre, though.

I just love the "quote" you put in your sig. Yeah, I could always get a riser big enough to compensate for the tailbone, which wouldn't be much since the tailbones are usually an inch/inch and a half. Hey, now there's an idea. You could easily slap on a half inch/inch pair of risers.

But... It's still a genre.

My criticism is that her skin is way too smooth. For having abrasions of that size and and magnitude... I think the texture of it all needs to be fixed.

That's why I like progressive. No genre! Wouldn't progressive be a genre, like alternative?

So your TC's are pretty much new cars and billboards? I wouldn't consider that a TC, myself....

What does Buckethead have to do with Chinese Democracy? O.o

Yeah, if you use it that way, but if you say, "Gay marriage isn't natural because marriage is traditionally between a man and a women", then it could be interchangeable with "normal". So only Christians get married? I had no idea. If non-Christians get married, why can't gays? You know, those things that are "united" in America, those STATES, "United STATES of America". States such as New York, Florida, California, Texas, etc. Nigga nigga....... Florida ain't no state.

Based on principle I can't find myself liking Bumblefoot, just because I can't stand the new GnR..... And I currently don't play any instruments. Would like to pick up drums though((mainly thanks to Rock Band, but I always have the bad habit of drumming on shit. Mainly my steering wheel)). And we have a few guitars laying around, a violin, and a keyboard.

You're looking at "natural" as it's literal meaning, but you're able to use "natural" in place of "normal". It works sort of like slang, but not as elaborate. I've never seen "bad" listed under synonyms for "good", but some people use the word "bad" to mean "good". If you're saying that gay marriage is only rejected by Christians...THEN WHY THE HELL DON'T THEY GET MARRIED SOMEWHERE ELSE?!?!?!?!? If that's true, then they're creating their own problems. Yes, because people((mainly Christians)) OFTEN USE IT TO MEAN JUST THAT. NATURAL. If you say it isn't natural because it can't cause reproduction, you are not using "natural" to mean "normal". And are you saying they should just move out of the country? Yeah, because that's totally plausible. We are suppose to be a FREE COUNTRY, we should have to move out of it to be free. MOST people who say homosexuality is wrong will tell you it's because the bible said so. The rest will probably use the "unnatural" argument, which has been disproven anyways. This includes most politicians, considering how there are a lot of Christian morals in our government.

There's a CPU that can run over 297,000MHz?

Like I said, you're just attacking his wording. If it was a norm in society then gay couples would be able to marry without a problem right now. Just because a bunch of gay people could get together on certain days and have parades, that doesn't mean that their way of life is considered a norm in our society. I never heard of people not being allowed to have parades because of certain aspects about them. The KKK gets together everyday...that doesn't mean what they do is a norm in society. That isn't attacking wording. People try to say that either because the bible says so, or because it can't cause reproduction, that it isn't NATURAL. Not normal. Natural. Natural and normal are in no way synonyms. And a lack of gay marriage doesn't mean it isn't a norm. That has to do with it being against Christian beliefs. If something is an everyday item/sight/occurrence/etc. then it can be considered normal in society. They can't marry, though, because Christians believe it is unnatural and immoral.

To be perfectly honest, all you guys are doing is attacking his wording. Instead of someone saying "not natural", they could simply say "not normal" or to avoid even more loop-holes, "It is not a norm in today's society." You can't argue that that's not true and say they're wrong. I think that this whole "gay marriage" subject is just way too controversial and it's gotten to the point where people have restated the same shit over and over again. Why doesn't someone just close the gay marriage topic, pin it and ban further conversation about it. Everything that could be said about it has been said about it. Just let it go. Actually, no. A lot of people say that it is not natural because by nature it is meant to be male and female((because that's how reproduction works)). And about it not being normal, how is it not a normal now? There are so many gay people who have no care in the world about what people think. There's so many homosexuals "out of the closet". There's gay days, gay parades, etc. It isn't exactly taboo anymore. Or even at all...

Dragonforce still has a lot of soul. I didn't start it, and somebody did say that, as a response to somebody else. Yeah I agree with you that soul is in the ear of the beholder. I guess what I'm trying to say is that Dragonforce doesn't appear to have soul to me. What music do you listen to anyways, Spaz? Lol @ ear of beholder. And me? Shit, I can't classify what I listen to. My playlists usually range from various types of rock, to various types of rap, to rap-rock hybrids, various electronica types, funk, experimental shit... My favorite band, however, is The Beatles. And too many sub-genres to even remember. Usually, by rule, if it sounds good/cool/interesting/fun/etc. I'll listen to it. However, I do have exceptions. But in general, I guess I listen to music.

How can you hate genres... I mean... It's something that is there... Just ignore it? Not really. See, you're looking at it like, "I'm this genre, so I need to sound like this", when really it's((or should be)), "I sound like this, so I'm this genre". And when there's 100's of types of metal with all different fucked up shit in it, saying you like "metal" heavily classifies you, and people are like, "WHY YOU LIKE SCREAMING AND THAT DEMON DEVIL SHIT!!!!"...... So I find genres a good way to decipher between sounds you like and sounds you don't. However, I'm loving the blurring of lines. Look at it this way, all these "new genres" pretty much means genres are mixing and sounds are blending. I'm loving where the rock-rap hybrids are going((I KNOW you'll agree with me there)). I personally FUCKING LOVE the Flobots... I also like Fort Minor. I just use genres to describe sound.

Flobots - Mayday. Really, shouldn't this be in entertainment? >.>

Limits are human's way of making you think you shouldn't reach higher than they do.

I'm pretty sure it's irrelevant at this point. If you get 64-bit software/hardware, your 32-bit shit will still work with it. Or at least, it seems as though there are no longer any problems with that.

I'll make sure I'm the one who does the honors, bro. It WAS my homepage at one point. Wow... And I come here because I've never been banned from any other site that many times. But yeah more strict I'm on it!!!!!!

I liked 'Flashing Lights', the one that was on GTAIV. But yeah, the guy's a complete poser. Apparently he got in a fit because he didn't get an award at the grammy's. That sounds about right. I remember him stating his last album was the "Best album ever created" or something like that. Huh, they don't seem emo to me.

Homosexuality happens in nature, with absolutely no human involvement. You can't call that unnatural. It seems like over half of America did just that. I saw Sky News doing interviews with people on Times Square; "Why do you want Obama?" "Erm, because he's going to bring change and I like him." That's one thing that annoyed me, they all said "He'll bring change.". Well ok, but how will he do it? I don't know much about what either president wanted to do, mainly because I wasn't voting nor do I live in America. Better than questioning how he'll bring change, how about questioning the fact that "change" does not mean "improvement". So both of you entirely misunderstood his point. Instead of flipping out, why not realize he was not even remotely saying that Obama will do what Hitler did? All he is saying is, to the people saying, "Oh, he will probably be good because he's got charisma!", is that charisma doesn't = good intentions, it just means good leader. Also, I don't see anyone saying that Bush is a better president than Obama. To say that him being better than Bush makes him a good president is like saying I have more money than a homeless man so I'm rich. That's just comparative, and doesn't mean crap.

I find Will Ferrel hilarious. However, you forgot one movie spot((in fact, it was the only one I knew about before the Superbowl)). Monsters Vs. Aliens. Looks ridiculously stupid, and the "preview" barely had any 3D parts in it. And for mainly these reasons, I don't feel like getting a trailer for it.