Spaz The Great

4chan isn't technically a porn site. It's an image board. There just happens to be porn sometimes. I would consider a porn site one in which the porn is provided by the site, not by the members who get it from other sites.

If I were admin you'd be the first member I banned

Fine. Here. Ignore how fast the clock goes.

Um, you're allowed two display name changes a month or something like that. If you changed it to InevitableGoat, that should only be one change. Simply change it back.

I need the original sig you were using. I have the DS sig .PSD so that's no problem at all. I'm simply going to remove the unnecessary white areas by putting the text on the actual image, so it should look a bit better.

I'll fix them up for you, if you wish.

Yeah, I hate sigs that show a lack of originality. Like no one can come up with their own ideas anymore. Only YOU see your logs. And staff. I can't see your log, you can't see mine. Members((even elites)) can't see any logs but their own.

That might mean you have the ability to save the game.... Can't you use MS Duos on the PS3?

People get crazy with their sigs and think they are so clever/cool with them. I could understand some lenience with them, as like, maybe 500x250 instead of 500x200, but once you become excessively out of the limits it just becomes retarded.

FAIL. You don't open with a closing tag.... Lame topic because no one could ever possibly win. And in a circumstance in which they would, it doesn't exactly matter.

Was never interested in WW. At all. And I was interested in MM, but when I played it, I couldn't really get into it. It seemed to have the slowest start I've played. Just didn't like it.

I fukkin lol'd I might be going to a religious convention soon, is it wrong to find chicks to fuck while I'm there? Nope. I don't think so, atleast. LOL. YOUR SHORT PENIS IS TOO FAT AND IT SMELLS!!!!!!

This is amusing. People are actually posting in here. Repeatedly. GO figure. Doesn't really matter, though. None of you exist, nor does the topic or the forum at all. The internet is just a "safe-place" I made in my head to escape reality.

Say what? In WW? Cause definitely not in TP, or even OoT. I've realized Ganondorf/Ganon is never really hard..... Just.... Tedious and annoying......

I had urges to find a walkthrough plenty of times. Keruri calmly talked me out of it a bunch of times. Except for one boss because neither of us exactly noticed what had happened((can't be any more specific than that without ruining a part of the game)). It was only for the beginning of that part that I needed it, then the rest was obvious. But yeah, Zelda is mainly puzzles. And it's a lot of fun. I <3 Miyamoto.... He = Genius.....

Well if you think it'd start a fight...wouldn't you think the smart thing to do would be to PM the person or just not ask it at all...??? No, this is a message board. It is made for discussion. ALL of you in this topic like the PS3, so you're ALL possible responders to my question, why limit it to one person if I could just ask in the topic and not have to PM multiple people to get an answer. And before you use this logic back on me with something like a newb asking a random off-topic question for the sake of getting an answer, my questions were about the PS3, in the PS3 general topic. So yeah.... Um, maybe that's why the question wasn't directed at you, but instead at anyone who could actually answer it? And yeah, I wasn't intending to start a fight either, I just wanted to ask some questions. Yeah, but you've SEEN how defensive people get over me asking a question. Yeah, I get defensive when people blatantly insult things, but hey, I'd understand them getting defensive if I just came in and said that the PS3 sucked and it was the biggest rip-off in the world. I didn't do that, though. I only questioned them. If you're going to claim something, get ready to back it up. This is the internet, NO statement goes unchallenged. Ever.

It's funny how I get yelled at for being an asshole when apparently my posts are so misread that even I have to go back and say, "When did I say that!?". I ASKED if the games sucked so bad that they needed to be pretty. That was, y'know, a rhetorical question. All I was trying to get at, was why graphics had to be uber-extreme in order for a game to be played. Um, the NES games are like 5 dollars, if I remember correctly. Big deal. They're five dollars. The PS3 downloadable games are 9. The N64 games are 10 dollars. OH NO!! It's ONE MORE DOLLAR for the same-gen of games. What is the PS3 offering you? PS1 games? You can just play the old PS1 games on there ANYWAYS. You can't play NES, SNES, N64, Genesis, or TurboGrafx games just by plugging your old cartridge into your new system. So that would explain the SLIGHTLY higher price. And with the arguing, you're kind of the one who started it by indirectly calling me a fanboy when all I did was question you guys.

And I never said you told Jared to do anything. I only pointed out that he was the only active poster in this thread that wasn't being a fanboy. I'm not trying to change anyone's opinions, I'm simply asking people to explain these things to me. Why are graphics so important? Why is the pay-to-download games on the PS3 the greatest thing ever, and yet the ones on the Wii are a "rip-off" because you can "download them for free online"((y'know, cause you can't do that at ALL with the games that Sony are offering. Nope....))? And I love how you act like you know what an-hero even means.......

Funny, I'm the only one not being a fanboy besides Jared, who is only asking how to convince his parents to buy a PS3. All I did was ask you guys a couple of questions. Yes, I read the notice. So OGTAM is allowed to go out of his way and say the 360 is a waste of money when such statement was ENTIRELY unnecessary because no one was even talking about the 360((y'know, since this is the PS3 topic)).... Yet, I can't question something that was said about the PS3, without even being a fanboy about it? Okay, that makes sense. Tilly, please, be an hero, kay?

No, I'm simply questioning a few points. You can either kindly answer them, get an attitude and start WWIII, or ignore me entirely. I couldn't care less either way. Yeah, I may be a bit on the smart ass side, but when the defense of a console is a feature that was torn down on another one I just like to know what the difference is.

ONLY ten dollars? But, you can simply download the game for free off the internet! Why pay for it? I'm not sure what your parents are like, but if it's the price that gets them, try to show them that it's actually cheaper than it seems. Explain to them what it has, such as having BluRay and that it'd cost twice as much to just buy a BluRay player than it would to get a PS3. Also mention that the online feature is free and that there is even a virtual game that you could download for free that allows you to talk to friends and what not. You have to show them that it's actually a bargain and not an expensive waste, to my opinion, like the Xbox360. Thanks, I will get some facts off the official website to backup my claims. I agree with you on the Xbox 360 front, at the local Harvey Normal they the PS3 and Xbox 360 set up next to each other, there is a very obvious difference between the Xbox 360's graphics and speed is to the PS3's. I still don't see the difference between the two, and even so, why is graphics such an important feature of a game? Can't play a game unless it looks pretty? Or do the games on PS3 suck that bad that they have to look pretty for you to buy them?

You just noticed it? Also, I dont say the F-word so much now. Yeah, I just noticed it. Now let's see how long it takes you to notice that I haven't been in this topic since that moment.

I enjoy it more than GTA, also. And yeah, 8 temples in total, I think. I'd list them, but that would ruin some of the game for you. So yeah, there's plenty to do in the game not even considering the temples.

I have a couple, mostly ones involving penis and rape and random dancing, though.

If it is what it promises to be, everyone will forget Guitar Hero even existed.