_Ray Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Vote: NVIDIA or ATI Intel vs. AMD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slyde Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 (edited) I guess this is a fair poll about personal preferences. However, Nvidia and ATI both make a good job producing good GPUs. Sometimes one beats the other and competition just goes on. This just boils down to if you like their logo or not IMO. CPU i have to admit Intel is taking lead by quite some. EDIT: Wrong forum and add a neutral vote. Edited January 30, 2009 by Slyde Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franswurst Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I prefer nVidia for the GFX, but thats because I've never had anything else and don't know much about ATI. As for AMD or Intel, its intel all the way, I had a AMD processor once which was supposed to be the same as (I think back then it was Pentium 4) but it really wasn't, and a friend of mine who deals with Computers a lot also said, that even if two processors from AMD and Intel are supposed to be the same they won't be, as AMD just doesn't have the amount of money to stick into research as Intel does, which is true. Now I have Intel and my PC is running great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damjan Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 ATI's way better with their GFX Cards,maybe not as good looking as Nvidia's,but they make a better performance.As for CPU's,Intel is better and will always be better than AMD's CPU's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockstarrem Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 You should put an "unbiased" option, which is what I'd choose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I find it funny that no one voting for AMD is posting. And I also find it funny that two years ago everyone((and the majority of this board's users)) were creaming for AMD. Now AMD sucks? My AMD works just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTA Don Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 AMD is fine, it's just recently Intel has been slowly taking over after the release of the Core i7 and the Atom. I'm really hoping the Phenom II AM3 will be AMD's comeback. All people care about nowadays is perfomance really so they can play Crysis on high settings. For GPU's, I'd go with ATI. ATI really made a big hit with the RV770 but now NVIDIA have released the GTX 285 and 295 so I'm wondering what ATI's response to this will be. Oh yeah, Intel are coming out with their Larrabee next year aren't they? I think they will have some difficulty entering the market especially since they are planning to compete against ATI and NVIDIA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damjan Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 ^ ATI's response: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814121294 Maybe not as good as GTX 295,but tops 285. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Ray Posted January 30, 2009 Author Share Posted January 30, 2009 ^ ATI's response:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814121294 Maybe not as good as GTX 295,but tops 285. I'm currently running on an 8 core 3.2 GHz Processor Computer, with 512 MB Ram and a 256 Meg Video Card, Guess what I'm hinting at onyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTA Don Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Please don't say you're on a Mac Pro. Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Ray Posted January 30, 2009 Author Share Posted January 30, 2009 Please don't say you're on a Mac Pro. Please. I was on my PS3. now I'm on my AMD Athlon 64 2800 processor lame ass PC. The MAC PRO has an 8 Core Processor?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damjan Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 ^ Badass PC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTA Don Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Umm.. yeah. Anyway, I thought the PS3 had seven cores. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Ray Posted January 30, 2009 Author Share Posted January 30, 2009 Umm.. yeah. Anyway, I thought the PS3 had seven cores. Technically, yes, because the 8th isn't really used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 ^ ATI's response:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814121294 Maybe not as good as GTX 295,but tops 285. From what I keep reading, everyone is having horrible times with that card.((even though it LOOKS badass with three fans on it )) Please don't say you're on a Mac Pro. Please. Why? What would it matter if he liked Mac Pros? Besides, I'd hope anyone who was going to put both quad core CPUs in there would at LEAST put 2 GBs of RAM. At least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damjan Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 ^ three fans that can't do shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now