This is going to start up shit again, but I have to defend a good movie. In Saw III, it wasn't those people who were being tested, it was the guy trying to "save" them being tested. Also, the reason all the "traps" and stuff sucked((and I know, they did)), is because it wasn't Jigsaw doing them, it was Amanda. That was the ENTIRE point of III, was the fact that Amanda fails at life. It also tied everything together and made so much more sense out of everything. There IS a storyline to Saw, y'know. There is something behind all of those traps and gory deaths. Had they done what you suggested and "changed the story so III was better", it would've become a sell-out movie and would've lost most of it's fans.