Spaz The Great

No, they really fucked up the tour if you ask me. You'd think they'd know America a little better than that.... Being a big company and all.

Twenty locations in California, yet only four in Florida and no Orlando? Fuck that shit. They are being douches to certain states

Ridiculous. I didn't say "ridiculously good", or "ridiculously cool" or anything like that. Just. Ridiculous.

I meant the whole post >.> My point was, why does it matter how it was made? What matters is how it looks after it's finished. Now, if it was altered at all((meaning he found it like that)), in a competition that could be considered sneaky or cheating, but besides that. And yeah, it was mainly because I needed the ground in the picture, but the lack of the upper body made a nice touch. No, I won't be participating. Would really like to see this thing get more organized.

oh ok i am sorry i dod not know they were making episode 2 a lating american character. i was just a little upset on how they were you know making other characters different races and not latin people. thank you. There is more in this world than latin people. Just because one company hasn't put your ethnicity as a playable character in one game series isn't exactly an important issue.

Actually, most people I know think Joey is a pretty good drummer. Admittedly, he blows the shit out of the rest of the band.

Parodying isn't something "anybody can do". I mean, not trying to start shit, but look at Huck.... Weird Al makes allot of Polka's. Anyway, Weird Al sucks, and the only funny songs are songs made up on the spot. We get loads of them on Whose Line is It Anyway. http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=XSranciXOvs Wow, THAT is an ignorant way to look at things. "LOL CNT B FUNI LESS WROT ON DA SPOT!!!" And there's nothing wrong with a good polka. That Beer is Good song is so fucking retarded. It just pisses me off to hear it, because these type of people don't drink beer because they think it's good. They don't even drink good beer((because you can't get it in America, fools)). And after listening to Scrotal Torment, I've come to the conclusion that Psychostick's target audience is 12-16 year olds. Also, I thought OP's video was stupid. Here's one I use to like to listen to. I'm use to it being "Debbie", but the name actually changes each time he plays it.

This was like.... Sarcasm, right? And I know who I'm probably voting for. And Toxic, why would you need to see the stock image? This isn't about who can do the most shit to a stock image, this is who has the nicest looking sig.... If you make the stock into a nice looking sig with only 2-3 steps, so be it. You said my stock in the last SOTW was "used to perfection", but I only did a minor change to it.

Diseases could cause a decrease in population as well, but that doesn't mean it's necessarily a good thing. Don't take that the wrong way though...I'm not really trying to compare homosexuals to diseases. And diseases are another way that nature prevents over-population. Granted, it's a lot less pretty way. But people don't realize that there is a reason for natural occurring things. Marriage is a religious ceremony even if people do look at it as a simple document explaining how two individuals are joined. If religions are beliefs that someone has chosen...then why are there homosexuals that want to be married through a religion that doesn't accept their way of life? Unless the two people go to Las Vegas and elope. But they want to be married through said religion because that's what they have to do in a Christian-based country. And furthermore, there ARE gay Christians. Just because most Christians don't "believe in"((because THAT makes sense)) homosexuality, doesn't mean they all have to be against it. Again, religions aren't straight-edged rulers that you must fit in perfectly. You don't choose a religion because it accepts you, you choose it because YOU accept IT. Are there people actually stopping homosexuals from being together? If there are religions that accept them for who they are...are there people stopping them from getting married? People might be protesting this shit, but that doesn't mean that it's stopping them from doing what they want. BUT if homosexuals want these privileges that the government doesn't want to give them...then aren't homosexuals technically trying to taking away the state's decision? Look at America as a fat kid with a box of cookies, if he chooses to hand out cookies to all of his friends instead of other peers...then that's his right. If you were to take away the cookies from the fat kid...then you're taking part of his freedom. First off, apparently there are people stopping them, because we're here talking about it, no? And most American states do no recognize homosexual marriages as legitimate marriages, regardless of how or where they got married. It doesn't matter. They won't LEGALLY recognize it. And the state doesn't have rights, BTW. They aren't suppose to run us, we're suppose to run them. That's how a democracy is suppose to run. Majority vote. The government doesn't deserve the freedom it currently has. When the government gets more freedom/power/rights, it just fucks things up more. That's true, but I think there is a greater chance of two individuals of the same gender agreeing to something like this for a loop-hole instead of two individuals of the opposite gender. I still would see it more possible for opposite gender friends doing this. I mean, it would look more "natural", people would have less to comment on it, etc. Keeping homosexual marriage unrecognized as a legal union because of this reason would just be stupid.

Be ready for some shit, from EVERYONE. I've been in your (almost)exact situation before. That was even WITHOUT the involvement of her brother being a friend and all.

Did you just make that?

This is all I could find. This post clearly states that you don't think they should be able to adopt, in the bold area. If you didn't think they shouldn't adopt, you wouldn't have reasons for thinking it((because well, that just doesn't make sense)). However, underlined you state that they would make good parents. Just as good as any other couple. This, does not, make sense. If they can make good parents, why shouldn't they be allowed to be parents? If you aren't against them, why do you think they shouldn't adopt? Well the reason it doesn't make any sense is because you either don't remember or never read my previous post that explain my reasons. I didn't really want to repeat myself, but I guess I'm going to have to. I feel that gay couples have the same possible chance of being good parents as any other kind of couple out there. Although, just because they could be good parents doesn't necessarily mean they should be allowed to adopt. The reason I don't think they should be allowed to adopt is not based on them being homosexuals, but because of the effect their homosexuality could have on the children they adopt. Now depending on the way you look at it, it could mean it's because of their homosexuality or the sponge-like effect of the human brain. If the child of homosexual parents is exposed to homosexuality, there is a greater chance of them too becoming a homosexual. It really depends on how old the child is when they are adopted, how they're raised, what they're exposed, etc. Hypothetically, if this were to happen then that child won't grow up to reproduce. Then again, depending on the way you look at it, the child/children that could have been might have turned out to be the next Einstein or the next Hitler. As this spread worldwide then there is a possibility that the percent of homosexuals of our population would slowly shift, which could possibly cause problems thousands of years in the future. The idea is a little out there, but it's a possibility. Since the outcome could go either way, it brings the whole scenario down to a "Is the glass half empty or half full?" type of questions. Now don't get me wrong, I feel they should have the same rights as any other couple out there. I just feel that there could be risk, which is why I don't think they should, but again, it's not my life. I'm basically just putting my two cents in. There's really no point in trying to prove me wrong or anything because this is just a random thought I had a month or so ago that I don't necessarily stand by as much as some of my other views or beliefs, so I don't really care too much what you think of my opinion or what you think of me based on my opinion. Being raised by gay parents doesn't = gay child. If that child isn't going to be homosexual, they aren't going to be homosexual. It isn't about WHAT a child is exposed to, it's HOW that child is exposed to things. Why do people have such a tiny understanding of the child psyche? I haven't taken a single class of psychology, child development, or anything of the such and I can still understand these things. That wasn't an attack at you, it was an attack at your words, and therefore, the vast amount of people who use that as an excuse as to why gays shouldn't adopt. You provided a point of view, and I'm providing an opposing one. Another way to look at it, though, is even if we produce more homosexuals, that means we get a nice decrease in population growth, and we are OVER-POPULATED. Homosexuality, to me, is kind of like nature's way of keeping species from over-populating. It isn't suppose to make lives different, it is just suppose to help the world from becoming over-populated. But people attack it for "being different", and are entirely destroying what small attempts it now has at saving our world from over-population. Love that video. Did I post it in this topic, or a different one? Actually, only religious people get married for religious reasons. Non-religious people get married all the time. Shouldn't they be not allowed to marry, too? And quite frankly, religion shouldn't be a bunch of straight-edge rulers that you must choose one and stick with it 100% always and forever. Religion isn't marriage. Your religion should be beliefs that YOU chose, not someone else. It should grow as you grow, and change the same. If your religion stays the same always and you never let it alter or grow with you, it isn't even a religion. It's a rule-book. That document grants couples certain privileges, such as the ability to adopt. Exactly. When it comes down to it, all they want are the privileges. Marriage used to be, still is by some, looked at as a religious bond between two individuals that love and care for each other that want to start a family. Unfortunately gay couples are unable to reproduce together and I don't think there is a religion out there that accepts gay marriage. If there were then I don't think we would have this current problem. Then again...I don't believe you have to be married to adopt a child. So I'm not sure what other reasons there would be as to why they would want to get married. Actually, there's plenty of religions that accept gay marriage. There are religions that don't care in the least about TRIVIAL things such as sexual orientation. We have this problem because there are governments that won't accept a homosexual marriage as a valid marriage between two people. You can get married to the same gender in America, provided you're in the right state((Cali?)), but the other states won't recognize you as a married couple. And as stated, there are various things that couples can do, ACCORDING TO LAW((not religion)), if married that they couldn't do otherwise. This is the LAW. I'm speaking of America here, we are suppose to be a free country, we are suppose to be free to make our own life decisions. Why are Christian values being forced upon us? THAT is where a problem is arising. Its the financial ones that are the problem. There are aparently too many loop-holes with it. The name sharing and joint adoptions are most likely not the problem with gay marriage. If those are the only things homosexuals want then I think homosexuals should fight for those rights instead of being allowed to get married. What, exactly, are you trying to say? Any "loop-holes" in financial gains from a homosexual marriage would be apparent in a heterosexual marriage. And even more benefit, you're not looked at as funny if you're in a straight marriage.

There's too many reasons why it will cause trouble for you. Her age, your friend, society, etc. It's really all about whether YOU feel it's right or not. But if you don't want all the trouble, all you can do is avoid the situation. Because you definitely won't avoid the trouble.

This IS about WORST PC, though, and the first post was worse than your PC. .... ... All these, "LAWL I ONLY HAS DUALCORE PROCESSOR1!!!!" posts are ridiculous. STFU, most of us only have one core. Some of us don't even have that much.

I agree with Toxic. Sure, it means more topics, but it's much neater and more organized.

My reasons for thinking gay couples shouldn't be allowed to adopt does not involve their parenting skills. In regards to that, I think gay couples could be just as good at parenting as any other kind of couple out there. This is all I could find. This post clearly states that you don't think they should be able to adopt, in the bold area. If you didn't think they shouldn't adopt, you wouldn't have reasons for thinking it((because well, that just doesn't make sense)). However, underlined you state that they would make good parents. Just as good as any other couple. This, does not, make sense. If they can make good parents, why shouldn't they be allowed to be parents? If you aren't against them, why do you think they shouldn't adopt?

But this is the one thing I just don't understand about Americans. These so called high gas-prices. Though I have to agree that the US has a potentially large influence in this sector, it doesn't mean the people have to go crazy about it. Like let's just be honest now, the prices weren't that high. If anything, relatively low. At some point in time, we were paying 8,30 USD per gallon. (with a EURO to USD rate of 1,4. In those days the rate actually was 1,55. So it would have actually been higher). And really, the government didn't say a thing. They were thinking about increasing taxes (and more on oil products). Did anyone here care? Well, no. People were just like "Oh, that's quite much. But meh." But that's just about all the complaining about prices. Of course, if you've got the resources like the US has, then it might be wise to use it. On the other hand, 4 USD isn't bad at all. The government might have just wanted to wait with using these precious resources until the prices get.. well, higher. Things are entirely different in America than they are in England/UK/Europe/etc. For one, our economy is weak as hell. Most of us in America((who aren't rich as hell)) are struggling to get by, keep houses, cars, jobs and such in our possession. The gas prices being that high was killing us.

He looks ridiculous. I'm expecting him to sound just as ridiculous.

But that isn't the basis of this discussion. This is about whether gay marriage is right or wrong, whether it should be allowed or not, etc.

Found my model, it's the Acer Aspire E360.

The subject of the Quran not being brought into it was referencing THIS topic. No one has brought it into THIS topic. And it shouldn't be on ballot. It shouldn't be an issue. Period.

Either he was intentionally trying to piss you off, or he didn't understand the topic. However, I figured he would've yelled some "TOPIC ALREADY EXISTS" if he misunderstood.

Actually, I do believe it's a full rejection of religion entirely. I think the "softer" one is agnostic. You'd probably fall in between them, possibly closer to agnostic than atheist. According to my baptist mom, if you don't believe in Jesus you're an atheist. This is exactly the type of ignorance that is giving Christianity a bad name.

No, I was playing HL 1 and I was on Xen, crawling through tunnels, and I've gotten into the habit of flash-lighting and checking corners to check for monsters. RIGHT as I clicked my light on a headcrab flew at me. I jumped and almost threw my keyboard. But yeah, those fucking screaming zombies scare the shit out of me.

MTA: SA, pretty much. I'm fucking myself in the ass waiting for HL2: EP3.