Ok, let's assume everything I say is right.
You can not do that... Despite you thinking that you actually know it better, cause you don't. Especially with that RAM. Not that it's bad in any way, but you just won't get it to 1200 MHz. RAM OC'ing takes quite a bit more than your CPU you know. Even though it's not far, you probably won't get further than 1100 on stock voltage. It's not even that rare that you simply won't be able to pass 1080 MHz on stock voltage.
Yeah, cause the BIOS one laptops really give you loads of overclocking options...
oh, right. [/sarcasm]
At the moment I'm running a system OC'd to 3,6 GHz, undervolted. It runs cooler than at stock. Don't be scared to overclock a bit more, you'll have enough room for that.
It does. Which is a good thing, I think.
I think so. But really, overclocking your RAM is the last thing one does. 800 MHz is fine for the average person, even for gamers. It's just for things like superpi and high overclocks when one wants 1066 MHz and above.
Overal the system looks fine, though 5 years is a very, very long time. I'd say 3 years. After that it's really going to be one of those old, crappy systems. 5 years is to long.
It won't brake down in that time though (well, it shouldn't).
1) I've decided that I'm willing to change voltage and timings slightly, and that 1150 is enough if I can get there.
2) Taken out of context, see my post above.
3) 3.2GHz is enough. Maybe 4 years from now when the PC is shit I'll go higher.
4) Oh goodee, the GPU has a better fan. Oh the more OC.
5) I need fast RAM, major multitasker. But I think Ill go with 1150 if I can get it. Ill probably upgrade to 12 or 16GB RAM in a few years anyway, so not a major problem if it only lasts 3 years.
6) Yeah, my current PC was built in the summer of 05, mid-range PC at the time, and now it fucking sucks. But my parents said that if they're going to spend over 2 grand on a PC, it better last a while.