Harwood Butcher

Yeah, I'll read that tomorrow. It's Christmas now and I'm taking a break from all this debating for a day. MERRY CHRISTMAS! (to those of you that celebrate it)

MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! (12:04) I hope everyone has a wonderful day and you all get what you want. Remember, it's about giving, not revieving. SO GIVE A LITTLE!!! EDIT: Didn't notice this \/ I'm getting a shit load of games and DVDs(hopefully). Then possibly a headset for my PS3, a longer lasting battery for my camcorder and maybe some other things that I'm forgetting about. I'm planning on getting a new TV soon. I heard the prices on them are gonna drop really low after Christmas.

Scientist once believed that an atomic bomb would destroy our atmosphere and that was disproven...so does that mean science is wrong since one thing was disproven? EDIT: Since it's the Holiday season. Who here celebrates Christmas?

Bold: That doesn't disprove God, that disproves one little thing that is in the Bible. You have to disprove everything in the bible or any religious book to disprove it. How does evolution disprove God or even religion for that matter? No one has ever given me a good reason why it does.

I saw this exact same thing on eBay before.

Lol, wow. It's only 11:15PM here (USA East Coast). Still have 45 minutes until Christmas. Well have fun with that TV. What kind did you get? (Do you know)

They're so expensive though.

The only reason I ignored that, was because I didn't really have anything to say about that. ...and the age of the earth disproves God...how? If you're trying to just disprove Christianity because that's my religion, then you're obviously trying to change my opinion, my faith. Christianity isn't the only religion. So you have to come up with better answers than that to disprove all religions. By the way, I didn't eat the apple. It was a fuckin' nanner. When the fuck did I say I wasn't going to explain something about my views on "science vs. religion"? Just to let all of you know, my field of study involves loads of science...well physics mainly, so I don't think science is a lie or anything like that. I just don't think science and religion are in the same category. So I just don't like trying to compare the two and trying to determine which one is right or wrong. I think both of them are right, but I think science has its flaws and I think religion is taken too seriously. I take a lot of the stories as metaphores. Although, that doesn't mean I don't believe in Jesus and God.

Not offering them the jobs because they're female is a bit too far also. Although, that really depends on the whole situation.

Uhhh...calm down now.

Do you use that board at all? Are you able to do any tricks on it? I might get a nosebone as well though, so thanks for showing me that. I haven't been looking for them as hard as I've been for tailbones. I'm hoping I could find them in a skate shop some where.

The fact that you ate the apple can be proved or dis-proved by a scientific analysis of your stomach. But there's more evidence that I ate the banana. So since there's more evidence, he didn't really eat the apple. According to his explanation. "If something actually has evidence (ALOT) it proves that you are wrong." ^ He doesn't give any details. He just says if something has a lot of evidence that it means whatever else is incorrect. I'm wrong how? Because something has evidence? Evidence of what? That I'm incorrect?...Ok...what exactly is this evidence that is saying I'm incorrect? What did I say that is incorrect?

The rules apply to everyone \/ r u cawing me stoopid? Oh, ok. Uhh, well thank you... You don't think I'd like that? I just don't want to go through a sex change to try and prove a point. It's not that I don't care that you have to go through all that shit, but I just don't like hearing about it(Yes, I know I don't have to read this topic, but it's too late for that now isn't it) People keep trying to prove that women could do all this shit...and I don't doubt that they can, but if you're saying shit like "I would be basically crippled for a week because my back would get so bad and painful.", how could you do these hard labor jobs if you're out for a week every month? You think I'm against women, but I'm not. I just don't like when genders or races single each other out. WE'RE ALL HUMAN. We all try to get along in our lives and we all, mostly, have the same issues. So why go through all this bullshit trying to figure out who has it tougher and who should be treated better because of what nature or the past gave them. Again, why should we respect a natural thing that you have to go through? I respect women going through child birth because they choose to do it, 90% of the time, and it's furthering our existance. Yeah, periods hurt and that sucks, but that's no reason to respect it.

BOLD: What? One thing having more evidence than another doesn't mean that the one with more evidence disproves the one with less evidence. So if I ate a banana 5 minutes ago and had it on video and you ate an apple 5 minutes ago when you were alone...that means I have more evidence that I ate a banana over the evidence that you ate an apple, which means you didn't actually eat an apple? I'm asking what the evidence is that I'm apparently ignoring.

"Ignore contradicting evidence"? What evidence?

So you’re saying as long as there is something that slightly proves something…that it could be considered fact? Theories are ideas that we create to explain something and if you believe in theories then you have faith. People have faith in God, which you could consider a theory that hasn’t yet been proven with physical evidence, but people still have faith in God just like you have faith in the theory of evolution. Just because your theory has more “evidence” than there is evidence in God, doesn’t mean that you’re right and that doesn’t mean that I’m right. We both have different beliefs and neither is above the other. Like I said before, a lot of scientists believe in a higher power, namely God. Even though that isn’t speaking for the entire scientific community, that still could cause science to be part of a religion. Religion: “A set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe.” Math can’t be used to explain Newton’s Laws, but we apply them to the laws to make sense of them for ourselves. We can’t use math to explain the universe, but it could help us understand it better. You're looking at what I said in a general sence and I’m not even gonna try to further explain what I was trying to say, because it’ll probably never be understood and I'll end up repeating myself.

... What? We certainly don't know everything about the universe(I know you didn't claim that). Science is used to better understand our Universe, but is not entirely or maybe even nearly correct. Postulates are considered assumptions in certain circumstances. A definition for "Postulate" is "to claim or assume the existence or truth of, esp. as a basis for reasoning or arguing." So a "postulate" is some what like faith...in a way. Although, you could consider Newton's laws fact, but I would consider them the very basics of physics and they could be disproven at any point, just like religion. I personally think science is just as proven as religion, although we could argue whether or not science could be considered a religion. A lot of scientist actually believe in a higher power that created our universe...so in that sence science can be viewed as a religion. You have to remember, we created mathematics to better understand things. So we're using something we created to try and explain our universe and who's to say our way is correct? Our universe is very complicated and I don't think we'll ever fully understand it. We might get really close...but never fully understand it.

At least you get a warning. I never get any warnings for constipation cramps. Those hurt like a bitch. ...You bleed half to death...? Are you exaggerating, because I never heard of a women dieing from their period. If every month women bleed half to death from that then there would constantly be women dieing from it. Don't get me wrong, I respect women with the whole child birth thing, but not for going through periods every month. Now I know you weren't the one that mentioned this, but if women have such a great "pain thresh hold", then I don't see why women are always complaining about having their periods. Women say shit like "You don't know what we go through". Yeah, no shit, but we can't change that and we'll never know what women go through exactly and we don't really like hearing women bitching. We can't do anything about it...so why bitch at us? By the way...why the hell are we talking about periods? Womens rights?

Well that all depends on what you consider science. Are you talking about the equations or other things?

Yeah, lots for long boards and such used in the 70s and 80s...which I'm thinking about buying. I think those are "nosebones" for the front of your board. They won't really help the tail from grinding down. Maybe for a little while, but I don't want to have to buy one every 2 or 3 weeks.

I think that site only sells pink ones. I think they make them that long because there are boards that wide. You could just shave it down if it's too big for your board.

Why didn't you record the killing?

So you're using one guy as "proof". That's like when females say "all men are pigs" just because of the douchebags they manage to attract.

I don't think they're too heavy. I heard they actually give the board a better pop. Since I don't have one I can't really give much information about them. They're just supposed to protect your tail from grinding off.

Thanks for that link. Yeah, a tailbone just protects the tail of your board. I use my tail to stop 90% of the time and it's totally shredded. I'll need a tailbone for my new board(s).