_Ray Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Personally, I don't know, I don't know enough about them. But what do you guys think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Aborted fetuses are often donated to stem cell research. I'm for it, personally, as long as it isn't done unethically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harwood Butcher Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Aborting for stem cell research is wrong, but if the baby was aborted because the female was raped and they then use it for stem cell research, then I don't really see any problem with that. Those fetuses might not have been born, but they were still able to help out the human race. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockstarrem Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Gotta agree with everyone above. That's one method of finding the cure of Autism I believe so I'm obviously biased towards it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitsune Inferno Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 I'm for it. Then again, aren't there stem cells in the umbilical cord? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 I'm for it. Then again, aren't there stem cells in the umbilical cord? I'm pretty sure. Which means regardless of what you do with your pregnancy, you can donate, right? Or wrong? I'm not sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butters! Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I'm for it. Then again, aren't there stem cells in the umbilical cord? I'm pretty sure. Which means regardless of what you do with your pregnancy, you can donate, right? Or wrong? I'm not sure. You can, but most parents chose to keep the umbilical cord frozen, because it has somthing that can heal a baby in certain circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bear Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 I believe in stem cell research as it could really help many people. I can't see why people would be against it if it can save lives and cure dreadful illness or even just help people have a better quality of life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Because there is immoral stem cell research going on, if I recall correctly. And it's that whole one person ruining it for the rest of us thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanoutlaw Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 I can't remember the source (read in magazine like Time or Newsweek) but early last year a story broke that someone figured out how to make a stem cell. This means not having to harvest them from aborted fetuses & bypassing all the moral issues related & still having the benefits of them. For the record, I'm 95% pro-life. This means I believe there should be a 72 hour waiting period & hearing to determine if it's acceptable. We ARE talking about killing an unborn child. However, there are circumstances that it is an option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lets See U In Action Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 I guess I'm mixed!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noxfaratos Posted May 12, 2009 Share Posted May 12, 2009 (edited) My Mother is a type 1 diabetic (She was born with it, type 2 is from being a fat ass). This is one of the main reasons we voted for Gore in 2000, he wanted to further research with Stem Cells and Bush didn't. Eight years of research down the drain. Who knows where we would be right now if it happened. Edited May 13, 2009 by Noxfaratos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connor Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 Any scientific research should be done as long as it doesn't affect people who don't want to be involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 My Mother is a type 1 diabetic (She was born with it, type 2 is from being a fat ass). This is one of the main reasons we voted for Gore in 2000, he wanted to further research with Stem Cells and Bush didn't. Eight years of research down the drain. WHo knows where we would be right now if it happened. No, type 2 is from having a high sugar-intake. I probably take in more sugar than a lot of fat people, but I'm not fat. And surprisingly enough, I have decent blood sugar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noxfaratos Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 My Mother is a type 1 diabetic (She was born with it, type 2 is from being a fat ass). This is one of the main reasons we voted for Gore in 2000, he wanted to further research with Stem Cells and Bush didn't. Eight years of research down the drain. WHo knows where we would be right now if it happened. No, type 2 is from having a high sugar-intake. I probably take in more sugar than a lot of fat people, but I'm not fat. And surprisingly enough, I have decent blood sugar. Haha. I was just making the connection that most fat people eat a lot of sugar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now