Spaz The Great

In terms of sales, looks like Wii has PS3 owned. In terms of votes, Wii has BOTH PS3 and 360 owned. Love that term 'shitbox'. Coming from the guy who made this topic "for the fanboys". Iroonyyy. MMMMM, I LOVE the bowling. I kick ass at it. Not with strikes, but spares. I win with spares. I was pitching 95MPH on the baseball game. Seems like how good they hit is entirely random. I had one person miss a 65MPH shot and hit a 94MPH shot Wii isn't a trend, buddy. And regardless of whether or not the 'trendy kids' like it anymore or not is irrelevant. Point is, Nintendo has something really good on their hands. They did something unique, unlike the other two companies who just took their last consoles, and made them more powerful. I've been playing the Wii all weekend at Keruri's house, and trying to play my PSP right afterwards was actually a disappointment. GameCube and Wii are entirely different. The GC is just another conventional platform. Push analog/d-pad to move, tap this button to jump, and this button to attack. How can you compare what happened to the GC to the Wii's future? Yes, of course power matters. Without it, we wouldn't have games that could properly utilize these cool things we have((like the Wiimote, for instance, it probably wouldn't be the same on say, a NES)). But having more power doesn't mean auto-win. And I love how the only support you had for this claim was "good graphics". YES, because graphics are the only important part of a game. To hell with graphics. I want GAMEPLAY. Possibly, but unfortunately for Sony, they've already run out of ideas. Twilight Princess = My new happy-zone. It OWNS. And for that last question, the question SHOULD be "what can a PC do that a PS3 can't?".... For that we have a decent answer. And that would be "Too much to even list here". PC > PS3 fo'eva'. BOLD: fanboy much? He said he THINKS people would prefer it on 360. He didn't say it would be better on 360. He didn't even say he liked the 360 better than the PS3. That wasn't a fanboy statement. As we all know, we're for the Wii. Anything else is just another console, so don't claim we're fanboying them.

Um, exotics are usually highly-expensive rarely-seen cars with outrageous designs to match their outrageous performance. I wouldn't even count most BMWs as "exotic".

You clearly stated that 28 Weeks Later was a remake. You said "that would be what 28 weeks later is....". So again, fail, sir, fail.

Ah, here's a little error in your statement.... He said that GTA IV would be different than PREVIOUS GTAs. And he said to STICK WITH THE BOXART because you can't BLOW OFF THE CLASSICS. If he were speaking of the last boxarts((which he was, as most of the people here are)), why would he even mention blowing off "the classics". Nice try at being "smart". Next try, try a little harder, and use less FAIL.

I love WreckedExotics.com. But they are becoming less and less "wrecked EXOTICS". Some of those pictures are no where near "exotics".

Um, sequel much? I'm rather certain that it's a sequel....

They are ALL good classics, buddy. Never say that again. And who cares if they change the boxart? I thought GTA2's boxart was cool. Doesn't mean GTA III's boxart isn't cool. im talkin bout the big picture. i never said the box art was bad. im saying stick with the good classics. such as the box art. but you wouldnt stick with the bad classics. like ummm...the classic coka-cola. thats a bad classic. cuz it had cocain in it. see what im sayin? jeese man! your just looking for ways to put someone down! I know what you're saying. You said the GOOD classics. Implying that before GTA III, GTA sucked. And I'm saying ALL the classics were good. I'm not looking for ways to put anyone down. Hell, here, I don't exactly have to look. Besides, since when was a little coke a bad thing? Previous games do not support this theory, though. Um, buddy, they ALL looked like that before release. That isn't final product. They are ALL good classics, buddy. Never say that again. And who cares if they change the boxart? I thought GTA2's boxart was cool. Doesn't mean GTA III's boxart isn't cool. jeese man! your just looking for ways to put someone down! i agree. can you use a little common sense when reading spaz? like seriously, its not so hard. I knew exactly what he meant, even though it was just a LITTLE unexplained. Its just an opinion, what he said. He also never said he wouldnt like the new one, he just said they should stick with the old one. Instead of telling me to use common sense when reading, tell HIM to use common sense while TYPING. Regardless of what he meant, I took it as it LOOKED. If he got insulted by my remark based on what I THOUGHT he meant, he should take that as a cue to be a bit more specific. The entire topic is about GTA. He said they should keep the GTA III trilogy's style boxart and then said "stick with the GOOD classics".

But there is no confirmation yet, so until there is, you can't use it as a plus. Funny..... Over here in America, PS3 games are the most expensive. Just because we aren't creaming ourselves over your precious PS3 doesn't mean we're fanboys. It means we didn't buy into the hype it was given((y'know, the giant promise with the significantly smaller outcome?)). I tell you what I am taking this into the warzone for all the fanboys to argue, Oh, you mean like yourself, right?

I'll give you the fact that Next did look appealing..... But 28 Weeks Later just looked like a milked sell-out.

Personally, I find the PS3 a tad hideous. The 360 looks nicer. Sauce LOL SAM Houser, it's DAN Houser BTW he would never have said that in the first place. Anyway, the PS3 version is better IMO because Rockstar have had more problems with the Xbox version than the PS3 version. Um, they are both real people. AGREED. Bigger isn't always better. It's still expensive and a lot of people still don't like the idea of it. DUH. Of COURSE it turned into a console war. It was a console war from the start.

Took the words right out of my mouth. Realism sliders would be just as bad as too much realism in the first place. Sure, it would make 99.9% of the players happy, but for some reason, it just wouldn't be good.

Dude, I make fun of mall goths. They suck... I probably said my clothing style could be labeled as "mall goth" since that is what it would look like. But I never said I was a mall goth. Ew.

I'm almost sure that's a fan-art poster. The description says "here is ANOTHER poster" and says it has a "different cast". Which I would assume, it's another idea for what the cast could be.

Yes, I was talking to Silberio. And I didn't say science wasn't flawed. I didn't say science was right. I said science and religion need to stay separated in topics unless it's a science vs. religion or a "scientific look at religion" or "religious scientific beliefs" or y'know, anything requiring both of them to be involved. I'm sorry, but religion doesn't do that great of a job explaining it. The best explanation I found from religion was the Pagan beliefs. But the thing about Paganism is, you don't have to be Pagan to share their beliefs. You could just be a spiritual person. But before I throw us off on an even bigger tangent, I'll stop here XP And not all scientists "run" from spiritual occurrences.

Why do I have to find out for you? What am I, your bitch? I don't think there's one. Or atleast, I don't remember ever posting in one.

No buddy, I never told you I was gothic. For I don't tell anyone I'm gothic, because I'M NOT. And how about this, learn what the f*** "gothic" means before accusing me of being gothic. Y'know, just like you need to learn what a "transvestite" is. And unlike you, I'm not stupid. I know you don't get what I'm saying. And I know no matter what I say, you won't get it. And there's a reason it's censored. Because CHRIS wants profane language censored. Because some people don't like seeing it.

The price will be way higher than that by the time the auction ends. Though, if people were SMART they'd wait to bid until the very end, forcing whoever it is to sell it at 10-50 dollars. Then I'd lol.

Yeah, but if you think a movie looks good and most of your friends see it and say it was good, you can probably bet you'll like it. And instead of jumping in a conversation so late you're on a different topic than me, why don't you actually read my RECENT posts so that you don't look stupid insulting me about something I'm not even talking about.

I called you childish and said you shouldn't be rating movies. I didn't start "yelling" until after that. And you're stuck on those three movies. Spiderman 3 I know will be a good movie. And most of my friends have already backed that up. I said Number 23 and Zodiac looked like they had promising storylines. But Saw III I watched. I also saw Benchwarmers, and it was funny. But you know what's even funnier? You're all, "idk how many times i have to say that", and I'm not denying that statement. At all. I didn't deny it from the beginning. Yet, I've repeated myself about Saw HOW MANY f***ING TIMES, and yet, you still don't get it. Regardless of whether I left you alone about the movies I didn't see, I would've pointed out Saw III because I HAVE SEEN IT. So I'd STILL be sitting here having this argument with you because you're too dense to understand the words I'm typing. And Kaydogg's opinion doesn't count. For SHE is stuck insulting me over something I'm not even talking about right now. And another thing, genius, I'm not gothic. Love how you put spaces in your words to prevent it from censoring. Aawww, think it makes you look cool? You're too cool for censors? f***wad.

Probably because most gamers are discouraged by its name. It sounds a little childish and is childish. Well that's just your picky opinion, I thought they were good. How is the EyeToy childish? It's simply a webcam..... Y'know, just as the "Eye" is. Speaking of which, the "PS3 Eye" is a worse name. It just sounds retarded. And the only good thing about Driv3r was the forklift.

umm no he said you havent seen number 23, zodiac or spider man read his post next time faggot well, maybe if you didnt just bust out and start yelling at me cuz of my opinion on a f***ing movie, maybe it wouldntve happened you get yourself into a lot of things then blame it on others. not my fault sorry I know what he said. And all he said was I didn't see them. But how about BOTH of you READ MY POSTS NEXT TIME, since BOTH of you are stuck on those movies when I'M NOT f***ING TALKING ABOUT THEM. f***ing HELL. If you can't keep up with what ONE person is saying, then get off the internet. And I haven't had specific problems with people on here in a while, so again, you haven't a clue what you're talking about. And yes, I'm getting pissed because you are misunderstanding me to a point of sheer stupidity and yes, you misunderstanding me is YOUR FAULT, for I have tried 30253409 times to word it in a way your brain can comprehend. Unfortunately, you just are smart enough.

Oh noes! The pieces of fabric I'm wearing are usually worn by females! Sooo, you're saying that it is wrong to have fun and dress up sometimes? Then I assume acting is wrong. Because that is what it essentially is. Dressing up as something you aren't. And I'm not a hardass. Dumbass. On top of that, what does being "hard" and wearing a skirt have to do with anything? My girlfriend wears skirts most of the time((that's her skirt, even)), and I know for a fact she could kick your ass.

But also, how long would this take? Any less than 3-5 seconds would be nothing but show... Any more than 5 seconds would become very annoying for when you just want to get in a car and take off.

Not often your wrong but I think you are, if you live in the UK it comes out next month. Look here http://uk.ps3.ign.com/index/release.html?c....game.locale=uk That says nothing about Driver, at all. The ONLY thing on IGN is news from LAST YEAR saying that Ubisoft got the rights to the game. No screens, no announcements, no anything. That's funny, why isn't it called the EyeToy? Even funnier, when the PS3 was first shown off, there was a silver EyeToy sitting next to it. Well the recent Driver games have sucked anyways, so there isn't really much harm that can be done. Well I don't know this is Ubisoft who are creating it and they have experience in creating games but I admit there must not be used to creating open world games. They create splinter cell games and Tom Clancys games. The point is that they didn't make Driver. Splinter Cell and Driver are entirely different. It would be like Rockstar buying the rights to a sports game. It wouldn't seem right at all. And noting that the best company for a game is usually the company that started it. They know it best. You shouldn't have done that IMO, save all your money for the PS3 and then you know you can get GTAIV definetly, but now you have PRE - Ordered GTAIV you might not have a PS3 to play it on. At least he'll have the game for when he gets his PS3. What if he gets his PS3 like a month before the game is released and the first batch of games are sold out already? He'd be screwed. You people are very unlucky I didn't pay a penny for mine, my mam and brother went and got it, and they got a good deal to. No, we're just not rich spoiled kids.

And at the SAME TIME, THEIR PLANET MIGHT BE ENTIRELY DIFFERENT. Y'know, someone from Mexico is probably different than someone from Canada. Or someone from Africa is probably different than someone from Japan. Same concept, bigger scale, buddy.