Spaz The Great

The cheesy wheelies and upside down flying were a bit..... Blegh? And the random color effects weren't all that necessary, at all. What I'd like to see is some people make a stunt video using the PS2 version of the games. No modifications, what-so-ever.

What is this topic even about, seriously?

Uh, yeah... As with most hallucinogens, too much will fuck you up... Stick with common sense. If all else fails, just stay away from it.

It has nothing to do with your standards.... You're only 14.

Heh. Not me. It's common to me. Infact, I've heard and seen multiple accounts of accidental trips off of NOTHING. Yes. NOTHING. It's so uncommon that puking happens. Seriously. I've never thrown up while high. I've thrown up while drunk. Although that was only once, it is still more than I have while high((and I've been high way more, so the numbers are there pretty good)). Funny that alcohol being more notorious for throwing up and you choose it over weed because you threw up while high. There's irony in there somewhere. But sorry about your bad high. Those happen and put people off. Eh, oh well, right? Yeah, nutmeg is a hallucinogen. Supposedly it can take like 12 hours to take effect and actually last for days. Damn I want some.... Not a drug. But the fumes do fuck with your brain making you light-headed and apparently hallucinate. Apparently Benadryl can make you hallucinate. The high off of Benadryl feels pretty good, but you usually sleep it off, and sleep a lot. You get rather tired.

My point is, you're saying there's "no other method" and then turning around and saying that it's possible to test on humans. Of course it is! Not only is it just as possible, but it makes more sense! It's more logical. We're only dependant because we're an ignorant failure of a race. The human race has failed. That's it. No, seriously. We've failed. Congratulations, world. Hope you're happy.

Oh, so since the government doesn't say it's wrong it must be perfectly acceptable? What a lovely approach to life. Animal testing isn't the only option, you said it yourself that human testing is an option. Can't get volunteers? Tough shit, buddy. You are a horrible Christian if you approve of animal testing or abuse in any shape way or form. Sorry to break it to you, but no where in the bible does it say it's okay to poke needles into animals and subject them to conditions that can KILL them. I'm sorry, but fuck ANY belief that wants to support that. We are nothing but animals. And quite frankly, being "human" and "superior" has gotten to our heads and made us lesser creatures than the animals we claim to be above. Being this "intelligent" and "advanced" puts a very important responsibility on us, and that's keeping our planet and the creatures that live on it SAFE AND STAYING REGULAR. No, I don't mean you need to run around the forests making sure animals don't fight. THAT'S part of nature. Animal testing isn't. We have FAILED as a species. I'm not dignifying this post with a response. You're being ignorant, stubborn, and repetitive. A shelter for animals. The places that take in unwanted and stray animals? Then a lonely child who wants a pet goes with their parents and picks out one that attracts to them? Then they have a loving family and the animal is saved from ever ending up in a testing facility? Yeah, you go and spends an ass-load of money at a shop to buy a dog when you can go down to a shelter and find one who hasn't wanted anything in months but a loving home and someone to take care of it and treat it with respect. Jace, you make me fucking sick.

You don't know much about Gerard, do you? I lol'd at this post. Or was it meant to be lol'd at?

Actually, IMO, for the style it looks like it's underdone. I've seen "over-done" eyeliner/shadow before. Heh..... I've done it before. Multiple times.

Saw III, Chestnut's mom bought it for me for my birthday. Good movie. Great series. Will definitely see IV.

Um, it inflicts damage on the animals, too. So you have absolutely no point right now.

A lot of people volunteer for testing. And just because humans are too full of themselves to offer themselves doesn't mean we need to take it upon ourselves to force animals to be tested on. Hey, why not force humans?

There is another method. HUMANS. It's the more LOGICAL method, it's the more HUMANE method, it's win-win all the way around.

To see if it was save to go into space they had to first send a dog and a chimp. If they hadn't done that they might not have tried going into space themselves. Meaning far less satelites. We test on animals to know if it would be safe for us. Nothing about preferences. I'm not supporting testing on animals for make-up and stuff. But for things like antidotes and medicens. For something actually use-full. I don't see that as 'miss-using' our capabilities. It's using them for the good, to help mankind. At least, that's how I see it. Yeah, we're being pathetic pansy egotist creatures. We use THEM to see if it's safe for US? My point still stands, what is safe for them isn't always safe for us, and what is NOT safe for them isn't always unsafe for us. Why should THEY take a hit for us? What have we ever done for them except destroy their home?

Negative. No PC release.

If they could do it without it being cheesy, it would kick ass. My brothers friend has it he says it is the best game he's played in ages. I want it for Christmas. It's worth it, trust me. Maybe not though if you beat it on the Gamecube. But improved AI, nice graphics, and the Wii functionality/controls....it's a great buy for the Wii. I've never even played resident evil before so I hope it doesn't matter that I'm starting off by playing the 4th in the series Hey has anybody heard about WiiFit? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifgYGGb--vM Yeah, looks pretty fucking cool.

A. I've never heard of cell phone technology being tested on animals... So how that's relevant is beyond me. B. Why test on non-consenting animals for technology to be used for HUMANS when we can test it on the HUMANS. Seriously... Testing on animals for use on humans? Doesn't even make sense in theory. That's like giving a dog a treat to see if he likes it so you know what treat to buy your cat. No sense. Beyond that, you can ASK a human if it wants to be tested on because we can communicate with each other, we can't communicate with them. So I assume since animals don't walk around and throw money at people for stupid luxuries they don't need, that means they are lesser creatures than us? Anyone in this mindset needs to piss off. Because you're no longer worthy of that "superior" species you put yourself in so much.

Kind of hard to believe since, y'know, universal remotes have to be programmed to the TV, so you'd need to know the correct code to work it. Um, that's 750 points..... And are these your actual points? Why is threats twice the amount as fighting? If I THREATEN to fight someone I get MORE points than actually fighting them? O.o I'm confused?

Actually, I think the odds are pretty good that there is some influence in that character. But as far as him proving it goes, good luck. There's a lot of anti-gamer crusaders out there, and for a video game to make fun of them is entirely normal.

I don't even know what you mean by that. You're a dumbass. Then testing on humans is ok, too. And killing a human for fun is fine as long as you eat them afterwards.

There is none. That simple. Vice City never had a train in it. Trust me, I owned it for PS2, and then later for PC. No train.

If you're using automatic for drag racing you're not that bright. You can get better times with manual. It would be nice, but it's never been in GTA, just wouldn't be use to it.

I currently have absolutely no plans for Christmas. Not planning on getting anything, either, but I know that won't stop people from buying me things.

Since it has more than Mario games, it will never only have Mario games. It's a physical impossibility because there have been other games made, that were not Mario.

Funnily enough, "The guy who posted RIGHT before your post"..... o.o This almost seems scripted.