Dazza Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 I was thinking that we should have the awards twice a year or in June, i really didnt like the fact that the awards were after christmas, thats when most people go away. So having twice a year would help those people out, and we can always have different winners each 6 months. I like the idea, do you guys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2003 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Not a bad idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 A really BAD idea. Having it around new year is great and makes it a bit more special. I wouldn't like to have forum awards in June again. Keep it to the yearly awards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Twice a year seems too much. You can't me "Member of the Year" if it's going to be taken away from you in half a year...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Yeah I was just about to say about the "of the year" titles, we wouldn't be able to do this prestigious awards anymore, that's my only concern. I see your point though in having them twice a year, but I think it's just simpler if we do them once a year for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 You could have a little award what will last for a month. Best member of the month, only staff votes for that. And after one month, it get's taken away again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHEW-GUN Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 i think its best if its once a year, but maybe more awards would be good. Chris, check the POTD i just uploaded. i though you might like it. goes with the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 We already have alot of awards, why more? If TGTAP had more awards having a award wouldn't be really special anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CroScorpion Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 If is so bad to be after Christmas then ti could be on some other time of the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHEW-GUN Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 We already have alot of awards, why more? If TGTAP had more awards having a award wouldn't be really special anymore. No I was just thinking that the Poster or Member of the month wouldn't be such a bad idea. Maybe have a page with the winners, something like they have in stores. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerard Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 I like the "Member of the Month" idea... nothing like a bit of pomp every few weeks to lighten the mood a bit. Having awards twice a year doesn't sit right, its a bit of a waste of time and effort doing them twice, and bear in mind that it would only be for the past six months, so longer-term contributions may not be recognised in the short term - that's where Member of the Month comes in.. Also for the titles, they would have to be "Best New Member.. 2007-H1" then "2007-H2" or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TM™ Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 It's not really a bad Idea having 'Member of the Month', although the negative side of it can lead to having the same member if it depends on their activeness. But in my opinion, I think that having 'Member of the Month' would lead to alot more members joining our site, but if it's based on how much posts they have, then I think that would have a negative side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHEW-GUN Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 It's not really a bad Idea having 'Member of the Month', although the negative side of it can lead to having the same member if it depends on their activeness. But in my opinion, I think that having 'Member of the Month' would lead to alot more members joining our site, but if it's based on how much posts they have, then I think that would have a negative side. I'd have to say that if someone posted alot and is in the direction of the Member Of The Month title, could loose it, because of swearing, arguing or disrespecting. So it shouldm't be only fo the most posts. Help,humor,activity in all. OR if youre a girl, you could sleep with Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TM™ Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Well, I wouldn't say it's a bad Idea (Not Chris Sleeping with a female member ), but having it wouldn't mean that much once you've earned it, so It's best to let it be for once a year, It would feel much more like a achievement than getting each month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazza Posted March 30, 2007 Author Share Posted March 30, 2007 Eh, i liked the idea, but Member of the Month is alright i guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now