tilly

and the guy being beaten looks like hes IN a trash can. i dunno.

thats the guy in the rockstar picture thats smoking a blunt!

Expensive as when i talk about the ports and emus and the remakes of old games. Less fun controller being that on most games its the equivalent to a nes controller. And i never said less exciting, moving your arms and hands to do moves, but all it is is a gamecube game with motion commands instead. making it a bit harder. and playing on a keyboard with KEYS instead of a dpad actually is easier for pressing and for the fingers not having to mash them in different directions with a thumb, but using 3/4 fingers and just touching them. also most games had more buttons than two, so playing them on PC and mapping out the controls to an easy area is actually EASIER. I never said Wii is for kids. I said the games are KID GAMES. they have KID CONCEPTS (most of them) and they are simple besides the motions. Maybe kids with bad dexterity cant play the wii because of its confusing movement controls for most games (wii sports and those games excluded.) The graphics for most games is about equal to ps2. And JESUS stop making ultra extreme versions of what i said, "WII IZ FOR KIDZ! LOL" what the gently caress is that? Im not a retard going around talking like that and I didnt even say that. Neither did i say "t3h graphics are sux." I said it has horrible graphics. thats just an addon to what i was saying. graphics isnt all of what makes it good, but after the gameplaying gets really boring, then graphics is needed.

5/10 because of lame voiceyness, breathingness, and shakiness.

well there is someplace, its not like your saves are sitting in some magic place. keep looking youll find it.

http://www.piercehomelandsecurity.com/veh_.../LA_SWAT_lg.jpg http://www.candiedskull.com/saints/images/fbi.jpg That is off of Saints Row. I always thought they used Yukons and Navigators instead of Fords.

There in your My Documents folder under San Andreas User Files, or something like that.

Indiana jones and the fate of atlantis. bet none of you could beat it.

Um, prove Nintendo did the backstabbing. And they didn't murder Sega. Sega was still rather popular until the Saturn, which, oddly enough, was out at the same time as the Playstation. Which ISN'T a Nintendo console BTW. What REALLY killed Sega was the fail of the Dreamcast. That was because of the PS2. And they don't want to "win".... They just want everyone else to lose. Oh wait, THAT'S THE SAME THING. They shouldn't want to win. They should do what they do and leave it at that. People will love it, people will hate it, and people will even not know they exist. Big deal. Make your console, and like it. Let us know you think it's good and tell us why. We'll decide if we agree or not. Don't shove it down our throats that it's the best thing ever. Ok so the backstabbing. Start at the beginning. Sony used to only do work in Japan, selling radios and little electronic devices. Sony got a new CEO and he decided that they should team up with some bigger companies to do some bigger business. They started work with TVs and eventually moved into the gaming business, but not on there Iown. They came up with a design and idea for the "Play Station" (lame name when you think about it) and sent it to nintendo. Nintendo agreed to work on the project with them and said that it would be a step up from the super nintendo, but would mock the Sega CD, which was sega game console with a disc drive instead of a cartridge. They worked on it for about a year when Nintendo abruplty stopped the "nintendo playstation" and released the N64. Which left Sony behind in their tracks, without much money because of all the work they did on the game console. LUCKILY the CEO decided to work even harder on the playstation to make it better than the N64 and the sega CD. So he did. And the reason for the fail of sega was the saturn not having anyone make games for it. That was the reason it failed, its not like it just HAPPENED. Like i said, nintendo made a bunch of contracts with game developers and publishers NOT to create games for sega (why i made the comparison of Microsoft to nintendo, paying a developer off so that the other console has a bad disadvantage.) And due to not having games on the previous or new console when Sega made the dreamcast, they had bad marketing, bad advertizing, and not very many american games. Dreamcast was better than ps2, just nobody bought the dreamcast because it had no games. Only a few japanese developers made games for it. wanting to win is not wanting everyone else to DIE is it? Im not talking about in a win-or-nothing type of race. there is one top selling, one second selling, and one third selling. not one top selling and two ruined consoles and companies. Nintendo tried to do that. Tried to beat sega by a landslide and killing there business in the process, which is not what was needed to do. Its like stabbing the runner next to you trying to win the race, theres no pride in that. BOLD: stop making senseless lectures please? i only posted that because your logic wasnt really on the right track with priorities. Get mad at one console for straight up winning, and not even caring about the other console for personally destroying the opponent. What im trying to ask is that you tell me what i have in bold has to do with me. EDIT:its hard to write big responses without spelling errors sometimes. Hey genius, the Nintendo Play Station project was years before the release of the 64. On top of that, the Sony Playstation was released BEFORE the 64. By a year in America. And to top that off, the N64 is the BETTER of the two consoles. So where you're getting "better than the N64" from is beyond me, entirely. The only thing the Playstation has above it is the CD-based media which allows for higher-res textures. The Dreamcast was utterly crushed by a strategically released PS2. Which, BTW, had a terrible start. The Dreamcast actually didn't have all that bad of a start. The high-demand for the PS2 could've had something to do with the LIES that Sony feeds us on a daily basis. Y'know, same thing that happened with the PS3. Both the PS2 and PS3 are no where near what they were hyped up to be. Don't get me wrong, I love all the games I had for my PS2, and my original Playstation((Playstation WAS the shit, but I preferred the N64)). Sony IS trying to pretty much defeat everyone else. With their BS lies and slick marketing. Again, I have nothing against the PS2 in general. I loved mine. It had some really great games on it. It's Sony I have the beef with. As one of our no-longer-here veterans said to me on Thursday, "It's like the Playstation[line] was born to bastard parents it didn't want." I'm not going to have something against any company for making a good console. But when they have to pretty much cheat to win, that's low. Yes, lying is cheating, my friend. I always thought playstation was better than N64. i guess its just an opinion. The nintendo playstation WAS years before N64 came out. thats the point... they unveiled there project to sony and left them behind. thats just messed up. And what are these "lies on a daily basis" your talking about. Thats like patronizing a game for only showing cutscenes. Whats bad about not having very many games at the moment? does that make ps3 not fun? I have also made up my mind that Wii is pretty crappy. Its a bunch of DS ports, Gamecube emulators with a less fun controller, childish games, and short repetitive minigames. The RE4 is exactly the same as the ps2 version with gamecube graphics. Ive got many games for it and i have only played it about 10 minutes in the last 3 weeks. I played all of the sports until i found out that it was exactly the same thing a bunch of times with annoying repetitive unrealistic things that happen. The games are way too expensive and the vitrual console is realy expensive too. The old nintendo and sega games are 5-10 dollars where you could get it for free on the computer. Most of the people i know just have a Wii that sits, unless they are under 12 years old. The reason why alot of people are buying it is because they play there friends new wii for like 15 minutes and want to play more. When they get it they have other friends play it and the chain goes on and on. They soon realize that its not fun and let it sit. Also most of the games are just movement triggered things like in MK (ex "swing left is dragonstrike to double jumpkick" etc, its just a ps/xbox game with buttons programmed as movements.) and you know the first online game will be POKEMON! its not even fun. just trades upgrades and battles that arent very fun or rewarding. But on top of that, it still has horrible graphics, has lower power than a ps2 (170 percent power of a GC) and the only game that is fun for more than 3 days is farcry which is not even CLOSE to the 4 times prequel on computer. EDIT: just guess

probably about 80 dollars

I would definatley like that. and an "eat dead bodies convention"

But they are planning to release one in august i think for the home.

350 Z car.

Um, prove Nintendo did the backstabbing. And they didn't murder Sega. Sega was still rather popular until the Saturn, which, oddly enough, was out at the same time as the Playstation. Which ISN'T a Nintendo console BTW. What REALLY killed Sega was the fail of the Dreamcast. That was because of the PS2. And they don't want to "win".... They just want everyone else to lose. Oh wait, THAT'S THE SAME THING. They shouldn't want to win. They should do what they do and leave it at that. People will love it, people will hate it, and people will even not know they exist. Big deal. Make your console, and like it. Let us know you think it's good and tell us why. We'll decide if we agree or not. Don't shove it down our throats that it's the best thing ever. Ok so the backstabbing. Start at the beginning. Sony used to only do work in Japan, selling radios and little electronic devices. Sony got a new CEO and he decided that they should team up with some bigger companies to do some bigger business. They started work with TVs and eventually moved into the gaming business, but not on there own. They came up with a design and idea for the "Play Station" (lame name when you think about it) and sent it to nintendo. Nintendo agreed to work on the project with them and said that it would be a step up from the super nintendo, but would mock the Sega CD, which was sega game console with a disc drive instead of a cartridge. They worked on it for about a year when Nintendo abruplty stopped the "nintendo playstation" and released the N64. Which left Sony behind in their tracks, without much money because of all the work they did on the game console. LUCKILY the CEO decided to work even harder on the playstation to make it better than the N64 and the sega CD. So he did. And the reason for the fail of sega was the saturn not having anyone make games for it. That was the reason it failed, its not like it just HAPPENED. Like i said, nintendo made a bunch of contracts with game developers and publishers NOT to create games for sega (why i made the comparison of Microsoft to nintendo, paying a developer off so that the other console has a bad disadvantage.) And due to not having games on the previous or new console when Sega made the dreamcast, they had bad marketing, bad advertizing, and not very many american games. Dreamcast was better than ps2, just nobody bought the dreamcast because it had no games. Only a few japanese developers made games for it. wanting to win is not wanting everyone else to DIE is it? Im not talking about in a win-or-nothing type of race. there is one top selling, one second selling, and one third selling. not one top selling and two ruined consoles and companies. Nintendo tried to do that. Tried to beat sega by a landslide and killing there business in the process, which is not what was needed to do. Its like stabbing the runner next to you trying to win the race, theres no pride in that. BOLD: stop making senseless lectures please? i only posted that because your logic wasnt really on the right track with priorities. Get mad at one console for straight up winning, and not even caring about the other console for personally destroying the opponent. What im trying to ask is that you tell me what i have in bold has to do with me. EDIT:its hard to write big responses without spelling errors sometimes.

i got the 100th page BITCH.

I think the AI should work really well with the euphoria (or whatever physics by them they use) and they should be able to walk in crowds and not hit eachother by manuevering around them.

can someone lock this? and alistar no, hes just quoting the first post like a noob.

and the suicidal photographer redneck.

happy peanuts soar, over chocolate covered mountain tops, and waterfalls of caramel, dancin nuget in the meadow, sing a song of satisfaction, to the world.what am i eating?happy peanuts soar, over chocolate covered mountain tops, and waterfalls of caramel, dancin nuget in the meadow, sing a song of satisfaction, to the world.what am i eating?

AMBUGUHS AND WOOTBEEA!

NICE! quad post on there own topic. and there is already a topic about this i think.

my new new new girlfriend just left for europe for 2 months.

^ < v

Hi, put this in the "Introduce yourself" topic.

haha the sims "too sexual" very funny. maybe for 2 year olds. EWWW THERE KISSING! DISCUSTING!haha the sims "too sexual" very funny. maybe for 2 year olds. EWWW THERE KISSING! DISCUSTING!