Spaz The Great

I don't think it will skip until you've killed those guys to keep Lance's dumb ass alive. This mission pissed me off SO BAD because Lance is a f***ING JACKASS. Okay, so here's some tips: 1. Lance cannot fall off his bike. Avoid riding near him AT ALL COSTS. He WILL swerve for NO REASON and HIT YOU and KNOCK YOU off your bike. I failed that mission too many times because of that 2. If you're using that PCJ near the bushes, you can go rather faster than Lance((although it seems like his acceleration is altered)). Take off past him((especially if he got spun around or something)), and destroy the cars hopefully faster than he can get there. Don't stay too far ahead of him, though, sometimes a car appears ahead of him, and thus, behind you, and you have to go BACK to him. I'd give you tips on the second part of the mission, but I don't want to give away what happens. Good luck, and hope you pass the mission.

My main point of debate is it could easily go either way right now. GTA 2 and III, being different engines and different numbered games, had the same main character. I think THAT would be cool, if Claude was always the opening character.

Um, you don't have to login.... Unless you're talking about where it says email and password, and that's for posting. In which, you don't have to fill out either of those sections.

I couldn't honestly care less, really. If it's the same storyline, great, I still know WTF is going on and it's pretty much the same world I've learned. If it's all new, wonderful, a new story to go with a new engine and a new system and such. Really as long as it's still GTA I'm cool.

Not if it isn't him, though. "Tom Jackson", an older looking male with white hair who might happen to be a lawyer wouldn't definitely be him. That breaks no laws, and it simply makes fun of someone. And GTA always makes fun of people. If he wanted to wait until HE was in the cross-hairs, then that would prove he doesn't give a shit about anyone but himself.

I did something similar on Vice City. I was standing ontop of a flipped over car and next to an airplane. When the car blew up I was projected into the airplane. Their proportions on airplanes suck ass...... The commercial jets, atleast.....

In that sense, it would be free-choice if you're male or female. The only options you can have is male, female, or the ability to choose one or the other. I agree. DON'T MAKE CHARACTER CUSTOMIZATION.... IT WON'T BE THE SAME. Altering clothing is nice, though. It makes your character unique enough to enjoy your way, but it doesn't change the actual character.

A lot of laptops use touch pads. I hate using my girlfriend's laptop because of it((don't get me wrong, I LOVE LAPTOPS)), playing games like RCT, Conquer, or anything that requires mouse-input, for that matter.

Um, dude, there is nothing "wow" about a sixaxis controller that will get almost no use, as most people weren't programming for the controller. Untried peice of technology? No. Sorry. A new optical format isn't "untried". It's just an improved form of an already in-use piece of technology. Nintendo are the only ones with balls here. Not really. Yes, it's new technology, but it's STILL just an improved optical drive, which means they aren't really risking anything by using it((except, of course, their f***ING PROFIT....)). New and innovative? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Do Sony Fan-boys REALLY think this about the sixaxis controller? IT'S TECHNOLOGY THAT WAS IN THE GAME BOY ADVANCE, DUDE.... IT ISN'T NEW. IT ISN'T INNOVATIVE. It's just an attempt to not look TOO bad next to the Wii, only problem is, it made them look worse((y'know, since it's a lame attempt at copying/outdoing)). There is a big difference between "having balls" and "being an idiot". Microsoft were being SMART in their decision, if they can upgrade the drive. That means as optical drives advance, they can just allow you to buy a new drive for your system, and not a new system all-together. Microsoft KNOWS there is no need for HUGE optical storage yet, so why waste money on it? Sony put an expensive, half-unusable format in their system, ran by a processor that is also expensive. This, of course, makes production costs through the roof. So they must sell it to us at a high price. BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE. This high price is STILL not enough for profit, so they're LOSING profit on the few consoles that people have enough money for. Can you say STUPID?

I'm posting that on 4-chan eventually. f*** making my own, and if I did, I'd probably use Photoshop. Here's one: Personally, I like the tarps..... Those are probably the best things on 4-chan.

I don't think MVI has made a fake screen in a while...... So they're all pretty much old....

Not sure about over there, but over here in America, the members are highly spread out. We aren't close enough together -.-

I HIGHLY doubt they'd do that for GTA IV. And besides, it wouldn't be San Andreas Stories if it's GTA IV. It would be GTA IV.... Like stated.....

He was just questioning your statement..... And BTW, jokes/sarcasm are harder to detect on the internet where we lack a voice or visual emotion. Hince the use of emoticons and [/end] tags. I'd like to meet my DS members. All of you, get to Florida, now.

No one is bad-mouthing anyone, and it isn't going "out of proportion". He is simply stating his backup for his opinion, and then someone said he over-analysed. THAT was when I said he was actually stating something very simple. Where are you getting this stuff from? Are you reading a different topic than I am? First you say I was complaining that you split the topic, NOW you're saying someone is bad-mouthing someone else. I seriously must be reading a different version of this topic or something.

You can't prove it either way, dude.....

Just because he typed a lot doesn't mean he's over-analyzing. He simply said that Rockstar have been deceptive before. They did NOT directly state that GTA IV will have NOTHING to do with the III trilogy. And by your statement are you saying we should stop making wishlists, predictions, digging for information, looking for clues, etc.?

Your link messed up. Downgrader Sounds cool. I might downgrade for fun.

That's with as little running as I was willing to close.((this means I'm lazy and didn't feel like attempting to close anything I couldn't see)) Meh. Stilllll shitty.

I was 4-channing yesterday and last night. Someone honestly needs to create a cure for that......

Nothing's wrong. From what I've read you only have 1 mission. Then the bigfoot or yeti or whatever is free-roaming and you can find him on your own.

I was going to comment this, but after reading the rest of your posts, you're clearly a fanboy, or misinformed. Both are about the same, really. Hey dude, you just pulled a figure out of your ass. Blu-ray disks are 25GB. According to SONY'S OFFICIAL SITE, BTW. And like already said, no game needs anywhere NEAR that. Hey genius, in America, we have the PS3((and don't forget about Japan)). We've played it. We know what it's like. You want to know what it's like? The Xbox 360. I played them both. Besides a controller difference, they play pretty well THE SAME. You, on the other hand, have probably never played a 360, so I'd be willing to bet you're entirely pulling your assumptions and comparisons.... Out of your ass.... It is funny you say this becase I read the Daily Telegraph about 2 weeks after Christmas and they said most people were waiting for the PS3 to launch in the UK rather than getting any other goods. They said it was the most sough after electronical product though they did say that the Wii sold quite a lot in England they said the 360 figures have declined. Anyway can someone tell me how the hell the 360 is better than the PS3. To me I think that the PS2 is the same as the 360. 360 doesn't ahve a 'X' or 'WOW' factor like the Wii has with its controller and the PS3 with its 45GB memory on the blu ray disc and also the SIXAXIS controller. PS2 same as 360? Not quite, buddy.... Not quite..... No wow factor to the 360? There is no wow to the PS3, either! And I've played the console. Again. I've played the console. I'm not pre-judging. BOTH OF THESE SYSTEMS are simply upgraded versions of the consoles before them. Nothing. More. No "WOW" factor. And AGAIN you pull out with that FALSE NUMBER. It isn't 45GB.... And you actually ate up that six-axis controller shit? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Do you know what six-axis is? Kirby Tilt N Tumble for the GBA....... That's like TEN YEAR OLD technology that Sony are boasting about in their "Super console". Huh. That's a little funny to me. If I can afford the Wii, I can wait a few weeks and afford the PS3. Thing is, I don't want to. Why? Because the Wii is way more worth the money. THE SAME THING THAT "WOWS" THE PS3................ NOTHING!!! Ditto. Way cooler console. Again, dude, you've never played the PS3 and I doubt you've played a 360. I've played both. They were both fun. Fun as in, they seemed like everyday gaming. They are just new consoles. They aren't anything special. They don't add anything unique to the gaming world, and this in undeniable. They offer gameplay, on consoles, plugged into a tv, with a controller((controllers VERY similar to the ones of last-gen, at that. Go figure)). Why is the Wii different? Because it is physically interactive. It lets me actually aim my gun. It allows me to swing my sword at my enemies. I can even chop and prepare food, work on people's teeth, become a surgeon, go fishing, play the original Mario games((not to mention every other old skool Ninty game out there)), and have massive group orgies with our WiiMotes >.> <.< >.> No one saw that last one............. o.o

Adrenaline? Adrenaline isn't really "something you're on". It's a body-made chemical, that, yes, does lessen pain. It won't lessen it enough for that, I doubt. And it doesn't delay pain by 10 minutes. It's usually until your rush is over.

What if by triggering the gun it auto-shoots a 2-second beam? What if it isn't a hold and shoot type of device?

There is no /f/...... /FOOL/!