Jezz Torrent Posted May 16, 2007 Author Share Posted May 16, 2007 heres my rating for the harry potter series Sorcerer's Stone: 3 Chamber of Secrets: 2 Prisoner of Azkiban: 1 Goblet of Fire: 0 GOF just wasnt like the other ones. i didnt like how the story went a different way than the others and harry is getting WAY too old, so thats kind of ruining the series Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 I could hardly sit through the first movie. I really liked the third and fourth one, though. The biggest problems with Harry Potter is the books get bigger and bigger. It becomes a problem with what to put it and what to not put in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazza Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 (edited) heres my rating for the harry potter seriesSorcerer's Stone: 3 Chamber of Secrets: 2 Prisoner of Azkiban: 1 Goblet of Fire: 0 GOF just wasnt like the other ones. i didnt like how the story went a different way than the others and harry is getting WAY too old, so thats kind of ruining the series You are so wrong! he has to get older, yet he is still looking like a 14 year old. So it is no way affecting the series. Here are my ratings: Philoserher's Stone: Book: 3 Movie: 4 Chamber of Secrets: Book: 2 Movie: 3 Prisoner of Azkiban: Book: 3 Movie: 2 Goblet of Fire: Book: 4 Movie: 4 Order of the Pheonix: Book: 1 Half Blood Prince: Book: 5 And the bigger the book the better. Edited May 17, 2007 by Dar-El Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Lord Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Philoserher's Stone: Book: 8/10 Movie: 8/10 Chamber of Secrets: Book: 7/10 Movie: 8/10 Prisoner of Azkiban: Book: 6/10 Movie: 2/10 Goblet of Fire: Book: 8/10 Movie: 0/10(Shitt According to me) Order of the Phoenix: Book: 8/10 Half Blood Prince: Book: 9/10 My Ratings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvoLuTioN Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 GOF sucked.The other three movie were really good,the chamber of secrets is the best movie in the series Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Lord Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Yeah.Just like Spaz said.As the books got bigger it was impossible to decide what to put and what not to put. They didnt mention Ludo Bagman was a Death-eater.In fast Bagman was not even depicted in the film.Niether did the torturers of Longbottom's parents etc.Due to this all shot.Films got boring according to me. You can see my ratings slowly decrease Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 (edited) Hmm, I have to say the third and fourth movie has lost the charm the first too had. I think it was the changing of directors. And I'm still sad Richard Harris is gone. :'( Edited May 17, 2007 by The Architect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezz Torrent Posted May 17, 2007 Author Share Posted May 17, 2007 You are so wrong! he has to get older, yet he is still looking like a 14 year old. So it is no way affecting the series. yes. he does need to get older for each movie. about a year older not 3 years older each movie and at this rate, he'll probably be like 25 by the time they finish the last movie, when he should be liked 17 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 No way should the movies ever be rated higher than the books. That's just BS..... And Dar-El, if "the bigger the book the better", why did you give Goblet of Fire a higher rating than Order of the Phoenix? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezz Torrent Posted May 18, 2007 Author Share Posted May 18, 2007 for a few of those movies that i rated either a 0 or a 1, i elaborated a little bit on why i felt this way about them. this is entirely my opinion, it does not mean you will feel that same way, please do not yell at me for it Spoilers Lady in the Water: 0-Usually, M. Night Symalan does thrillers and scary movies. Lady in the Water was like a drama. It was boring, and didn't really make sense. Pulse: 0-It was about a computer virus breaking out and killing people. Give me a break! The Return: 0-I don't remember much about it, but the storyline didn't make any sense whatsoever. Saw 3: 0-It basically ruined the Saw series for me. It totally defeated the purpose of Saw. There are supposed to be ways out of the traps, and in Saw 3, the people just died. Penny Dreadful: 0-The victim was hiding in her car the ENTIRE movie. It was boring as hell. Nothing happened, and they would introduce new characters and kill them off right away. Blood and Chocolate: 0-It just wasn't what it seemed. I thought it would be a thriller, but it was more of a love story. The Number 23: 0-This has to have been one of the most boring movies I've ever watched. It did have a great storyline, but nothing interesting happened in the movie. There weren't any parts that were suspenseful. Also, his wife kept preventing him from finding out the truth about what was going on, and they never explained that. Also, if the wife knew he wrote the book, why would she stay married to him knowing he killer his other wife(or girlfriend, I don't remember). Black Christmas: 0-This movie was just flat-out pathetic. The acting was horrible, and it was very cheesey. The Hills Have Eyes 2: 0-The remake of the first Hills Have Eyes was incredible. It was a very good movie. This one was a major disappointment. We can start of by saying that victims in horror movies aren't supposed to be military soldiers, and they shouldn't have assult rifles. Also, military forces (Trained or not) would be able to handle a situation like this. 12 or so US soldiers, armed with M-16 assult rifles and pistols, would not lose to a group of 7 mutants with blades. Speaking of mutants, in this movie, the mutants were so stupid. They looked like they had mold growing out of there skin. There deformities were just way too bizare. One of them had a tounge that was about a foot long. Give me a f***ing break! It is not in any way possible to have a tounge that is that long. Slow Burn: 0-Pretty much another boring drama movie. The twist at the end was dumb. The person who turned out to be the killer had nothing to do with the movie. He was in like 2 scenes. And they kept dragging the twist out. First, this guy was the killer, then this guy, then him, and so on, so on. The Tripper: 0-Just like Black Christmas. It had pathetic acting and effects. It was however very funny, but also very boring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 This is going to start up shit again, but I have to defend a good movie. In Saw III, it wasn't those people who were being tested, it was the guy trying to "save" them being tested. Also, the reason all the "traps" and stuff sucked((and I know, they did)), is because it wasn't Jigsaw doing them, it was Amanda. That was the ENTIRE point of III, was the fact that Amanda fails at life. It also tied everything together and made so much more sense out of everything. There IS a storyline to Saw, y'know. There is something behind all of those traps and gory deaths. Had they done what you suggested and "changed the story so III was better", it would've become a sell-out movie and would've lost most of it's fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezz Torrent Posted May 18, 2007 Author Share Posted May 18, 2007 well, you guys wanted me to say why i hated the movies, so i did it wont start a fight if you dont yell at me because of my opinions. which you didnt do in that post ^ and i appreciate it i know its the point of saw 3 i just didnt like that point so i didnt like that movie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 Bolding isn't always yelling, buddy. It is also used for heavy emphasis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezz Torrent Posted May 18, 2007 Author Share Posted May 18, 2007 (edited) i can kinda tell when people are yelling. Edited May 18, 2007 by Jezz Torrent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 Anyone of you seen Lost In Translation? My numbuh 1 favourite ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazza Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 No way should the movies ever be rated higher than the books. That's just BS..... And Dar-El, if "the bigger the book the better", why did you give Goblet of Fire a higher rating than Order of the Phoenix? True, I didn't put them in the same leauge though. I'm rating them differently, I couldn't rate a movie and book as the same. Cause Order of the Phoenix sucked, Goblet of Fire pwns it. But Half-Bloob Prince pwned them all. I really have to read Order of the Phoenix, I might of matured since the last reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezz Torrent Posted May 18, 2007 Author Share Posted May 18, 2007 i couldnt even get through GOF we stopped reading half way through Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 I've read them all. Some twice, to find the stuff I didn't catch the first time through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvoLuTioN Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 HBP was is the best book in the series Hope they dont make a sucked out movie out of it by deleting some of the main parts like they did in GOF!!(HBP IS BIGGER THEN GOF) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!! I just found out JK Rowling is might wright an eighth HP book, to challenge Christopher Tolkien's (Yes, that Tolkien) recent LOTR add-on. I'm ecstatic! (There is no smily that describes what I'm feeling) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvoLuTioN Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 Were did you get that info from??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 (edited) Hang on, trying to find it again. Got it. How do you do the link thingy? Edited May 18, 2007 by The Architect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezz Torrent Posted May 19, 2007 Author Share Posted May 19, 2007 shrek 3 added Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 Just came back from Blades Of Glory. One of the best. What was wrong with shrek? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazza Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 HBP was is the best book in the seriesHope they dont make a sucked out movie out of it by deleting some of the main parts like they did in GOF!!(HBP IS BIGGER THEN GOF) And when did you learn this? AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!! I just found out JK Rowling is might wright an eighth HP book, to challenge Christopher Tolkien's (Yes, that Tolkien) recent LOTR add-on. I'm ecstatic! (There is no smily that describes what I'm feeling) I know...it's gonna rule. And it's going to comic relif as well. Were did you get that info from??? It was on the news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now