Jump to content

steveplayer

Members
  • Posts

    246
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by steveplayer

  1. @ Twisted: You said Atheists aren't flawed because a book doesn't tell them to kill :/ Anyway, the religious book doesn't tell anyone to kill. It is the persons own warped view of the words. So unless the book actually says, "Kill him now!", that is just your gross oversimplification of the subject. I gave you examples of flaws with Atheists. Every one is human, regardless of beliefs, and humans are flawed. Atheists aren't perfect. Gerard never said that. He brought up that gay people were being persecuted in Christian countries, then said no one had brought the Quran into it. I posted a list of Islamic countries where they are being persecuted worse than in Christians countries. The Quran says being gay is unnatural and this is how they punish it in Islamic countries. You sit here complaining that specifically "Christians" are holding back gays. Atleast we don't behead them in public for showing they love someone. @ Spaz: Atleast the topic of homosexuality is on the ballot in your country. Seeing as being gay isn't a choice, imagine being born into a world that wants to behead you for who you are. So America's treatment of gays somewhat pails in comparison to that of some Muslim countries. @ Gerard: No I'm not using that as proof of Christian tolerance. I'm saying that around the world, people are being denied their right to life rather than just their right to sharing a last name and benefits. It may not be relevant to the certain situations you've been discussing, but in retrospect, you have more rights than those in other parts of the world. I'm all for letting gays do what they want. I have a Religion, and I more than understand I must enjoy life. The Religious people Twisted is constantly referring to are the gung-ho fanatical ones. There are a lot of fanatical people in the world, but NOT all are Religious and NOT all Religious people are fanatical. I myself and hundreds of other people I now who are Religious don't walk around imposing Religion on people. We don't persecute them for who they are, that is incredibly close minded. You seem to be persecuting ALL Religious people for the sole fact that they have Religion. Not everyone who has Religion is the way you picture them. A vocal minority gives a bad name to a silent majority. The same way the majority of Muslims aren't and don't want to be thought of as terrorists, the majority of Christians aren't intolerant bigots.
  2. Because we know all. You know all? What the hell does that even mean? What makes your ideas better than mine anyway? I could easily do many illusions, write a book about it and then fill the inbetween bits with lies? amirite? As it was all just illusions, Derren Brown fooled a group of people into thinking they were contacting the dead, but they weren't, he was making them think that only through the power of his mind. Just because things that jesus did are written in a book, doesn't mean it was even true. Any christian who reads this, will most likely ignore it, that's just the way their heads are wired, don't like their ideas being challenged. For example raybob, just because I think you should get hit by a train doesn't mean it should happen, even if it's what the majority of people think too, that's your decision, hopefully you'll make the right decision. (No offense man ) Something else, what scientific evidence is there for god existing, and what scientific evidence is there for the big bang existing? You have to get it through your head that everything isn't just fucking Christians. Islam is the second biggest religion in the fucking world and they are exactly the fucking same if not more intolerant than Christians in a lot of respects. So why do you immediately go straight to Christians? Don't reply with "Well it has been well documented, the bigotry of Christians" or some shit like that. The bigotry of mankind has been well documented, not everything wrong in this world is because of Christians. Atheists are pretty damn flawed in their own rights. I don't have to get anything in my head, I know it's fucking muslims too, I'm just using Christianity as an example, because I haven't seen any muslims on here telling me I couldn't marry a guy. Not everything wrong with the world is due to christians, but most of it is, equal to any other religion like it. I don't think you can really say Atheists are flawed, they don't kill people because a book tells them to. Atheists are flawed. Everyone is human, Christian, Muslim and Atheist, and humans are flawed. So, you're saying Atheists don't kill because the don't follow a Religious text? Vladimir Lenin was an Atheist. Lenin was a mass murderer who used concentration camps and "reeducation" to impose his Atheist beliefs on the population. Richard Dawkins debated a Rabbi at Oxford. Dawkins was defeated in a vote at the end and now claims the debate never happened. When the Rabbi posted the video of the debate for the whole world to see Dawkins defeated in an argument over Religion vs Science, he wrote an offensive letter to the Rabbi accusing him of speaking like Hitler! Couple of flaws there. @ Gerard: http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/gay/long.html People are actually being put to death in Muslim countries by law. No where in Christian societies are people being put to death by law for their sexual orientation. I'm a Catholic and I'm not against gays at all. They can do as they please. I don't care if they adopt, marry, fuck, love, travel, ANYTHING. It has nothing to do with me. Atheism is just as close minded as they claim Religion is if they think all people with a Religion immediately condemn something. The Bible is a set of stories, if you take it literally like a lot of people think ALL Christians seem to do :/, then you might as well believe a wolf is going to imitate your Grandma and try and eat you. This is the struggle of our time, just as interracial marriage was the struggle 50 or so years ago. Societies progress, it is only a matter of time.
  3. Because we know all. You know all? What the hell does that even mean? What makes your ideas better than mine anyway? I could easily do many illusions, write a book about it and then fill the inbetween bits with lies? amirite? As it was all just illusions, Derren Brown fooled a group of people into thinking they were contacting the dead, but they weren't, he was making them think that only through the power of his mind. Just because things that jesus did are written in a book, doesn't mean it was even true. Any christian who reads this, will most likely ignore it, that's just the way their heads are wired, don't like their ideas being challenged. For example raybob, just because I think you should get hit by a train doesn't mean it should happen, even if it's what the majority of people think too, that's your decision, hopefully you'll make the right decision. (No offense man ) Something else, what scientific evidence is there for god existing, and what scientific evidence is there for the big bang existing? You have to get it through your head that everything isn't just fucking Christians. Islam is the second biggest religion in the fucking world and they are exactly the fucking same if not more intolerant than Christians in a lot of respects. So why do you immediately go straight to Christians? Don't reply with "Well it has been well documented, the bigotry of Christians" or some shit like that. The bigotry of mankind has been well documented, not everything wrong in this world is because of Christians. Atheists are pretty damn flawed in their own rights. Because we know all. It is people like you who make it hard for others to profess their faith. Instead of defending your faith and why you believe, you say stupid things like this. Furthering the view that all Christians are like you does more harm to Christianity than good. After reading each post of yours I find myself strongly disliking you more and more. If you can't be serious in a serious discussion, keep your stupid remarks to yourself and GTFO. I don't want any replies to this. A few things had to be set straight, now lets get back on topic. Anyone who continues this is destroying a topic which was creating a great discussion of the issue. Keep it on topic guys.
  4. Obviously I've seen the BTTF Trilogy at least a dozen times, otherwise I wouldn't have an account on www.bttfhillvalley.co.uk Though Doc was not being sarcastic in the movie, as he in 1955 found it hard for a president to be an actor, and also asked if Jane Wyman was first lady, you were being sarcastic to me. And, it is my respectful opinion that Bill Clinton was not a good president, and much less a good person, but he does look like a Conservative next to our Socialist President. Never start a sentence with the word 'And'! Also, (see what I did there) it is my respectful opinion that you don't know what the fuck you're on about. You were born half way through his two terms and still wetting your bed when he was on his way out. The more you throw around the words conservative and socialist the more I feel you have no clue what you're talking about and are just parroting someone else. Back on topic. I would have to do some research before I could opine which Leader I felt served you best.
  5. I want a 360 and this SO BAD right now Looks awesome, thanks for the vid Husky
  6. Oh you will have a great time.

  7. I've spent a good part of the last couple of days pwning him. His level of retardation is quite large, I think it has enveloped him completely.

  8. As technology gets better and better, things get harder to code. e.g., the PS3 is much harder to code games for than the XBOX 360. Which is exactly why the 360 has better games, because people actually WANT to code for it((thus, no forced rushed games)) Well, Spaz, that is a matter of opinion, in which my opinion is that I don't enjoy consoles whose games are 100% war related. Forza 2. Sony can be complete dicks sometimes. The way they have the PS Store setup seems stupid to me. Why have a million different regions and every one differs in the content. I know it is very easy to get around but why should you have to? It seems M$ have been getting the upper hand on Sony recently, paying for DLC, demos and such. Sony seem to just sit with there thumbs up there arses and watch 360 owners gloat. They could spend a bit of money, which could easily be made up, to get PS3 owners some DLC for GTAIV, bastards I love my PS3, but it is more of a media center than just a console.
  9. It is after all a 'Wishlist'!

    I wish the PS3 had some DLC LOL

  10. LMFAO! Go to the DLC wishlist topic. He reported one of my posts :D

  11. Needs to be done. I'm one of many who dislike him but seem to be the most vocal. He's calmed down a little and hasn't given me much more ammo. I'll leave it awhile and see what he presents me ;)

  12. You gotta be more thorough when you look for the parts. Or, if they're too small to see, use a microscope. I assume this is suggested from experience? Nope. Phoned up your Dad last night and he gave me some advice for you. Honestly, is there no end to your faggotry? OK, Steve, you're really starting to be a dick to me now. If you cannot stop following me around and replying spam to my posts, you will be reported. So what, the crap you posted in here isn't spam? I should report you right now for the sewage you've spewed all over these forums. Constantly making pointless topics and posts to; 1) bump up your post count and 2) clutter the fuck out of the forum. Maybe if you obeyed the forum rules you wouldn't need people parenting you on the forums.
  13. You gotta be more thorough when you look for the parts. Or, if they're too small to see, use a microscope. I assume this is suggested from experience? Nope. Phoned up your Dad last night and he gave me some advice for you. Honestly, is there no end to your faggotry?
  14. I so hope to God you're right Claude. After seeing some of the videos and info about TLAD I feel I MUST get it Maybe down the line, if PS3 doesn't get any DLC I may buy a 360 and get TLAD. It just looks so awesome!
  15. This is getting ridiculous now. First it was the vast amount of topics per day and now it is constant double, triple, and quadruple posting. The word on the picture describes you in general. It's not the topics fault your level of fail is so titanic that failure is pretty much a certainty.
  16. Sorry Huck, but lol. :/ You're the one who constantly brings up the fact you are already over budget. Wouldn't having a relatively cheap rapetastic GFX card appeal to anyone who is straining with the dollars?
  17. ^ Epic Failure < Graduated school in 2007 :/ V Is currently using oxygen in some way
  18. Ati 4870 Buy it, use it and be done with it.
  19. I just work with what they give me :P

  20. I am actually quite calm, both now and when I posted those comments. You don't need to be angry to point out examples of human ineptitude and both insult and provide humor for others who read it.
  21. Create a new topic for that. e.g. "Laptop Overclocking" Simple eh? Yes, we do all learn something new everyday. Wow you're a tool. :/ People see a broad topic title like "Overclocking" and think it is a general topic to discuss overclocking (whodathunkit!?) and you are just adding what you want to know about overclocking. Creating new topics seems to be your forte so I can see why you'd go straight to that. More topics doesn't make a better forum when said topics would be redundant if it fell under the heading of a previous topic! e.g. "Overclocking" "Laptop Overclocking". Root words being OVERCLOCKING! I just had a look at the Computer + Tech page and half the topics on the damn screen are yours. 4 of them overclocking topics. If someone made a "General Overclocking Topic" you could still rape the daily post count stats without having to make separate fucking topics on overclocking!
  22. LOL, it appears I have pleased people with my humorous and frank assertion of a member, as per your siggy :P

  23. You're welcome for the LOL, that was its intention :P

×
×
  • Create New...