Slyde Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 (edited) Pointless topic? All off-topic threads are pointless. I'm just bored... I reckon the egg... Edited July 20, 2007 by WackySlide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oskar Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 But where did the chicken come from? The egg. Where did the egg come from? The chicken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitsune Inferno Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Dinosaur laid an egg, and a retard baby hatched. That retard baby was the chicken. So the egg came first. Yeah, I didn't understand it, either. Does the question specify what kind of egg, like if it was a bird egg or a dinosaur's egg that hatched a retard baby? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slyde Posted July 20, 2007 Author Share Posted July 20, 2007 (edited) Not really, just whatever egg.. Dinosaurs were all wiped out 0.0 And anyway if you are right, it means that the chicken will evolve again. I highly doubt that. Edited July 20, 2007 by WackySlide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huckleberry Pie Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 It's just a matter of evolution; some scientists say that birds evolved from dinosaurs - the bird then evolved into a chicken after a few millenia... Am I right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slyde Posted July 20, 2007 Author Share Posted July 20, 2007 Alright, what about the chicken? If chicken weren't found after billions of years through evolving, it must of started with the chicken, not the egg. It might of started from bacteria and all that sorts of stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shady9 Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 It's just a matter of evolution; some scientists say that birds evolved from dinosaurs - the bird then evolved into a chicken after a few millenia... Am I right? this the 1st time that i hear this ,, but i think its true . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerard Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Well an egg is just an early stage of the chicken, so its not as if there could have been a chicken that never came from an egg. The answer is that a almost-chicken animal laid a chicken egg due to the final genetic malfunction that made the modern chicken. So the egg came first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 I think it was two chickens who laid eggs. So, the chicken. Besides, it doesn't make sense if the egg came first. An egg needs the mother henn to keep it warm and to feed the chiclet once it hatches. The egg would never develope or hatch without that and would die before it was born. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rashon. Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 I think it was two chickens who laid eggs. So, the chicken.Besides, it doesn't make sense if the egg came first. An egg needs the mother henn to keep it warm and to feed the chiclet once it hatches. The egg would never develope or hatch without that and would die before it was born. So where'd the hen come from? I say the egg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 I think it was two chickens who laid eggs. So, the chicken.Besides, it doesn't make sense if the egg came first. An egg needs the mother henn to keep it warm and to feed the chiclet once it hatches. The egg would never develope or hatch without that and would die before it was born. So where'd the hen come from? I say the egg. So where'd the egg come from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rashon. Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 (edited) I think it was two chickens who laid eggs. So, the chicken.Besides, it doesn't make sense if the egg came first. An egg needs the mother henn to keep it warm and to feed the chiclet once it hatches. The egg would never develope or hatch without that and would die before it was born. So where'd the hen come from? I say the egg. So where'd the egg come from? Well, the egg had to come from something. Edited July 20, 2007 by Rashon125 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little_Chestnut Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 Simple ... The chicken came first through evolution. Then again if it evolved form a species that laid eggs then the egg would have came first, the early "chickens" probably developed more and more during each generation resulting in an egg that hatched a chicken that we know today. ... I just argued against what I choose. Go me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smallpancake Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 But where did the chicken come from? The egg. Where did the egg come from? The chicken. *Diggs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slyde Posted July 21, 2007 Author Share Posted July 21, 2007 Hmm..has anyone tried wikipedia this? lol its 50 50 right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 I think it was two chickens who laid eggs. So, the chicken.Besides, it doesn't make sense if the egg came first. An egg needs the mother henn to keep it warm and to feed the chiclet once it hatches. The egg would never develope or hatch without that and would die before it was born. So where'd the hen come from? I say the egg. So where'd the egg come from? Well, the egg had to come from something. That is called a chicken. I win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rashon. Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 (edited) That is called a chicken. I win. So then where'd the chicken come from? Lol, I'm confusing myself. Simple ... The chicken came first through evolution. Then again if it evolved form a species that laid eggs then the egg would have came first, the early "chickens" probably developed more and more during each generation resulting in an egg that hatched a chicken that we know today. Okay, that makes sense. I'm stumped now. Edited July 21, 2007 by Rashon125 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Posted July 22, 2007 Share Posted July 22, 2007 It's inexplicable either way. So let's say one day it was just there, the big bang caused a chicken/egg to suddenly appear. Now if you think logically, the egg wouldn't survive without a CHICKEN to take care of it and make it hatch. So, in fact, it was either two chickens or a chicken AND an egg who came first. I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slyde Posted July 22, 2007 Author Share Posted July 22, 2007 It's inexplicable either way. So let's say one day it was just there, the big bang caused a chicken/egg to suddenly appear. Now if you think logically, the egg wouldn't survive without a CHICKEN to take care of it and make it hatch. So, in fact, it was either two chickens or a chicken AND an egg who came first. I think. Good point, unless there is a specie of bird that could survive in an egg without a mother to protect... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Lord Posted July 23, 2007 Share Posted July 23, 2007 I agree with Gerrard. Nearly Perfect explanation! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oskar Posted July 23, 2007 Share Posted July 23, 2007 It's inexplicable either way. So let's say one day it was just there, the big bang caused a chicken/egg to suddenly appear. Now if you think logically, the egg wouldn't survive without a CHICKEN to take care of it and make it hatch. So, in fact, it was either two chickens or a chicken AND an egg who came first. I think. Dude, you're making no sense. We're saying what came FIRST, no one cares if it survived or not (well some would but you understand). We know the egg came from the chicken but the chicken came from the egg whilst the egg came from the chicken and you get the whole point. And at your last comment: Explain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slyde Posted July 24, 2007 Author Share Posted July 24, 2007 If you guys think that the chicken came from another specie of bird, where did the other of specie of bird come from? It must of had an egg before it as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gycu Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 I voted for the chicken but I dunno the answer God created the chicken then it made eggs ... w/e Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tilly Posted July 24, 2007 Share Posted July 24, 2007 (edited) actually what came first was the evolutionary step back, the jungleflow. the ancestor of the chicken. there was a defect in the genes that made a chicken inside an egg. meaning the egg came first. then the chicken made constantly defective offspring (the chicken) with other jungleflow, making actually more chickens then there are jungleflow. egg If you guys think that the chicken came from another specie of bird, where did the other of specie of bird come from? It must of had an egg before it as well. you know, not all things lay eggs. the ancestors of the jungleflow could have not laid eggs, but a reproductional defect or crossbreed could have made it lay eggs instead of give birth. Edited July 24, 2007 by tilly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slyde Posted July 24, 2007 Author Share Posted July 24, 2007 I thought all bird specie laid eggs. Anyway, you are probably right. I'm still not completely sure. But now, chickens are winning the eggs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now