K9 Krew Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 yeah exactly it would work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jared Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Yeah, thats an important thing to remember, Rockstar would have to pay royalties to use real car names. Frankly, it's not worth it and it is a lot more itneresting without it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K9 Krew Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 yeah i guess that true but i would add that touch of realism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAPlayer Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Yeah but when (IF, and I think it's going to) the PC-version of GTA IV gets released, we can start modding you know, and that means we can make cars with real names and everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K9 Krew Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 yeah i guess so but would'nt you just complete the game first and then start modding it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAPlayer Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 yeah i guess so but would'nt you just complete the game first and then start modding it Totally agree man, first you complete the game, then you start modding it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 KidsNO WAY. It's immoral to shoot down kids with a sniper or put them on fire with a flamethrower. Juse, NO!cars with regular namesthrough out the series they'v had these names. It's quite nice. What names would you want?Strip ClubsAlready had, and surely will have again.Present DayWhat's that? You mean just like the game should be in 2007? Yea...kids is a retarded idea...thats a law suit waiting to happen. Cars...i mean like Mustang and Viper not Stallion and Banshee and stuff like that...not made up names b/c that would be way eaisier for the find the car mini-missions...((in GTASA i had lots of trouble)). Present day... yea i mean like 2000-2010...anywhere in between Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TR Jason X Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 grab people and drag people and chuck them off buildings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rashon. Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 I'd much rather have the made up car names Rockstar makes. It's more unique, in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Agreed. I really like the names. Besides, it would be way to expensive to use the real names and it would also cause some other probs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gycu Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 They`re going to use the same fake names ,but no1 knows.BTW How expensive would be 4 R* to buy the real names?The game will cost 60$ so if they sell 1 mil games they`ll recieve 60 000 000 $ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Still, it's expensive buying all those name. And what's nice about GTA is that they change the names. Like the Visage instead of the real Mirage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gycu Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Costs more than 60 mils? damn then they`re really expensive The game will be selled in more than 1 mil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bear Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Its better for R* to use that money to make better games then to use to get permission to use a car name. Its a name big deal. Whats so bad about just driving a stallion instead of a mustang as they are basically the same except for the name. Is the name really that importnat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 They could invest there money on better things for the game instead on the names. And I would prefer something called Stalion then Ford Mustang. By far... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gycu Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 The real car names work fine 4 me ,I was just talking about the money they need to have real car name Infernus=Lamborghini Diablo the same ,just like Bear said.What if they make a real city but with fake names and cars? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 (edited) yeah, what if... I wouldn't care. Would make the game better. GTA is not supposed to be that realistic. As long as it's fun. And I don't want a mission saying, steal the Diablo from Mr. Wanka. I'd prefer it being Infernus. Edit: Gran Turismo 4 didn't have porsche and lamborghine and stuff, cause they wanted to much cash for it. Edited February 19, 2007 by Jace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrLlamaLlama Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Its time for me to put this bitch to rest... The reason there are not real real cars in Gta gasmes is plainly because car manufacturers dont want to see, or for other peopke to see their cars being turned into flaming trash heaps. Fair enough Gran turismo have damage models, but not to the extent that would satisfy gta players... Also, it would cost alot less for rockstar to make a 'knock - off' version of a car with a similar name, whilst avoiding lawsuits... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tilly Posted February 20, 2007 Share Posted February 20, 2007 grab people and drag people and chuck them off buildings heh that would be cool.... ^(mr lama) yes, and if they have the cars in there games, they WONT be able to have model damage, only textural. new subject. better falling physics. all i can say cuz i dont know much about that kind of physics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jared Posted February 20, 2007 Share Posted February 20, 2007 The way I see it, Grand Theft Auto should be taking you to a different work in reply to cars, locations and such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K9 Krew Posted February 20, 2007 Share Posted February 20, 2007 i hope you thatwe start off by working in a garage in some city and then you get involved in crimes that would be cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E.J. Posted February 20, 2007 Share Posted February 20, 2007 I hope we could walk into all buildings and have the empire buildings like VCS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K9 Krew Posted February 20, 2007 Share Posted February 20, 2007 yreah i agree with you there E.J that definetly would be cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAPlayer Posted February 20, 2007 Share Posted February 20, 2007 Walk into all buildings? I don't know about that man, I mean, sure having the option to walk into every damn house would be kinda cool, hehe but would it really work? Maybe so, it's a good idea you know and it makes it even more realistic. Hehe, then I can sneak inside a house and surprise a girl in the shower Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K9 Krew Posted February 20, 2007 Share Posted February 20, 2007 yeah but you were able to do it in SA when you do the robbery missions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts