ZigZagZig Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 i know every country has its dangers, but it got me thinking, which country is the most dangerous? i would say iraq, but things seem to have calmed down there at the moment. so im thinking colombia, apparently it has the highest murder rate in the world. and i know some of the countries in africa are pretty rough too. what do you guys think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harwood Butcher Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Canada... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Dangerous to live in? Or dangerous as a nation? I think you mean the former but you should probably clarify that before all the anti-ChinaRussiaAmericaland arguments breakout. But yeah pretty much any middle eastern country having trouble with bombers, suicide bombers and the like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherman Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Antartica. Notice the population, obviously a very dangerous land to live in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrLlamaLlama Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 It's Antarctica I see your point though... But it's not as if crime rates are high and you get random driveby shootings.... Somewhere like Columbia would be pretty dangerous... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanoutlaw Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 (edited) Penguins doing drive-bys....... To live in, Columbia hits pretty close to the top, but that's based on what I've seen in the news. Silberio has said Chile is a little rough, too. I suppose any country that doesn't recognize basic human rights would be bad as their law enforcement would be selective at best. As a nation (as Chris brought up) it's a toss up between Iran & North Korea, but the worst isn't even a nation. It's terrorist groups like Al Qeuda (spelling?) that aren't in any one place but have weapons & a seemingly endless supply of people who are willing to die for their cause. Antarctica doesn't sound so bad, all of the sudden. Edited October 31, 2007 by Urbanoutlaw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wheelman101 Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 (edited) Canada... Aha and if you lived here you would love it and same with your parents, the gov just cut the tax's in half again. the Canadian dollar is on the rise(highest in 50 years) we just found a huge ass area in the Yukon loaded with oil. but the only stupid thing is, there are canadians going to american to buy like a vehicle and the dealerships down there are saying screw off! it was on the news about american dealerships not allowing canadians to buy any vehicles. i think it would be Columbia or Iran and i just noticed my mac and cheese is boiling... Edited October 31, 2007 by wheelman101 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaz The Great Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Antarctica doesn't sound so bad, all of the sudden. The extremely low population means an extremely lower chance of it being targeted by terrorists. Extremely lower chance of any type of crime including murder, rape, and theft. Extremely lower chance of dealing with assholes who can't drive for shit. I'd mention lower chances of finding love but we're all nerds here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charger Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 El Salvador use to be very dangerous, right now it kinda is, once it freaked me out when I was going to the market I spotted a car in the road and some guy fixing it, when I came back the guy was dead. That was about 3 years ago, I haven't gone there since. I think the Middle east is tough, with all the bombs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surrealistic ArtSweet Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 (edited) no offense here, but i would say either russia or america, because they have the most advanced war technology, if the president turns bad into someone like hitler or something, it would be the most dangerous place EDIT: oh, and add korea for that, they just got a nuclear device and now they are save in it Edited October 31, 2007 by ArtSweet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godfather Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 USA. George Bush, duh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Lord Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Jammu And Kashmir, India. Its just that the facts are suppressed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K9 Krew Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Here's how i would put it 1. Sudan 2. South Africa 3. Congo 4. Israel 5. Iraq 6. N Korea 7. Sudai Arabia 8. Russia 9. France( France may look pretty innocent but it's a pretty dangerous place. 10. Brazil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gycu Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Romania ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
little_homer Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Hmm.. no Finland. I would imagine drunk drivers with their shit ass ladas and saabs doing drive bys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slayer Posted November 1, 2007 Share Posted November 1, 2007 USA It's not just Bush, it's that many of the people are uneducated about the middle east and east Asian countries. They don't even have an idea where they are located! So when Bush sends his troops to "spread democracy" you get a war between the West and the East. No wonder Russia is going to stand up for the middle east. If they would just turn their back on it nothing would prevent USA from leading another Crusade war. Just remember the Crusades. Were they lead in Israel? No. They were lead in north Africa and Persia. And were they lead to free Christ's grave? No. They weren't lead anywhere close (except the 1st Crusade war, out of 12). Is this war lead to spread democracy and rebuild Iraq? My ass! And since history repeats, who can guarantee that war won't spread much further and away from their primary target? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris82 Posted November 1, 2007 Share Posted November 1, 2007 USA.George Bush, duh Let's see. George Bush is stupid to say the least. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has made threats toward Israel and hates an entire race/religion of people to say the least. USAIt's not just Bush, it's that many of the people are uneducated about the middle east and east Asian countries. They don't even have an idea where they are located! So when Bush sends his troops to "spread democracy" you get a war between the West and the East. No wonder Russia is going to stand up for the middle east. If they would just turn their back on it nothing would prevent USA from leading another Crusade war. Just remember the Crusades. Were they lead in Israel? No. They were lead in north Africa and Persia. And were they lead to free Christ's grave? No. They weren't lead anywhere close (except the 1st Crusade war, out of 12). Is this war lead to spread democracy and rebuild Iraq? My ass! And since history repeats, who can guarantee that war won't spread much further and away from their primary target? The USA shouldn't be "policing" the world like it is doing, however, the US has tried to help those in need, such as in the dictatorial states like Iraq. However, the crusades had nothing to do with the US. (As the US wasn't even close to being discovered or colonized at the time of the crusades) The crusades were Christians trying to get 'their' Holy Land back from the Muslims. As for the most dangerous country, it's Iran. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connor Posted November 1, 2007 Share Posted November 1, 2007 (edited) Hmm, I'd say Iraq, people get killed everyday. Although if you listen to the news a lot, in the UK, people get stabbed all the time and sometimes shot by brain-dead druggies who smoke too much weed, which is pretty dangerous.. The other day I heard about a dude who set off a big firework in some dudes shop! Happens around Manchester and other big places where chavs seem to settle.. Edited November 1, 2007 by Connor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitsune Inferno Posted November 1, 2007 Share Posted November 1, 2007 North Korea. If you so much as complain about your rations, you and your family would sent to prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harwood Butcher Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 Well today in Economics my teacher listed the five most dangerous and poorest places in the US. The number one most dangerous and poorest place is some where in New Jersey. ...Fun fact... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wheelman101 Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 (edited) North Korea.If you so much as complain about your rations, you and your family would sent to prison. and correct me if im wrong but isnt it true that only 150 people are allowed into the country ? like tourists and that crap I still say iran..they want to "destroy" afganistan and iraq.... Edited November 2, 2007 by wheelman101 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slayer Posted November 2, 2007 Share Posted November 2, 2007 However, the crusades had nothing to do with the US. (As the US wasn't even close to being discovered or colonized at the time of the crusades) The crusades were Christians trying to get 'their' Holy Land back from the Muslims. Ofc the USA wasn't involved into the Crusades. That was just a comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZigZagZig Posted November 2, 2007 Author Share Posted November 2, 2007 Hmm, I'd say Iraq, people get killed everyday.Although if you listen to the news a lot, in the UK, people get stabbed all the time and sometimes shot by brain-dead druggies who smoke too much weed, which is pretty dangerous.. The other day I heard about a dude who set off a big firework in some dudes shop! Happens around Manchester and other big places where chavs seem to settle.. i never really thought about it, but yeah the UK is acctually pretty dangerous in places. two days ago my mate was attacked for no reason by someone with a knife. he was slashed across the chest, but hes ok though. but it really open my eyes to what britain is really like. well i have been looking on the internet, and i found out that the UK has a higher violent crime rate than the whole of the USA, and when you think how much smaller the UK is, its just staggering. and the murder rate is getting higher too, even kids as young as ten have been involed in murders. its just crazy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris82 Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 However, the crusades had nothing to do with the US. (As the US wasn't even close to being discovered or colonized at the time of the crusades) The crusades were Christians trying to get 'their' Holy Land back from the Muslims. Ofc the USA wasn't involved into the Crusades. That was just a comparison. Exactly, but it really can't be compared all that well, being that what the US is doing isn't about religion or reclaiming land, it's gidding rid of dangerous terrorists. IMO the US should give Iraq a pullout date and that will be that. Then focus should be put on Iran. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K9 Krew Posted November 3, 2007 Share Posted November 3, 2007 Isn't this about 'the most dangerous country in the world' not about the Crusades which occurred like thousands of years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now