azn Posted January 1, 2008 Share Posted January 1, 2008 Recently I have taken the time to learn about what really happened on the 9/11. To my surprise, I have seen all these unusually convincing videos on Youtube which showed evidence that it could possibly have been a planned event. I have linked a couple of conspiracy videos below, I would like you to all watch them and give me your honest opinion. This link above accuses the video Osama Bin Laden made in December 2001 in which he admitted full responsibility for the 9/11 attacks that it was a fake due to the low-quality and several other facts stated in the video. http://youtube.com/watch?v=wbCcb6NV8Io&feature=related This video shows just before the plane hit the WTC, something strange occurred and that there was an extra piece of equipment on the bottom of the plane that hit the 2nd WTC. This link, where the supposed airliner crashed into the Pentagon, upon closer inspection of the 5 frames has 2 blue trails just ahead of it. (?) http://youtube.com/watch?v=iS2rlAoKiy4&feature=related This is a computer generated video showing what happened to American Airlines Flight 77 when it headed for the Pentagon, then some other interesting yet puzzling stuff... This is a Scientific recreation of the 9/11 attacks. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVvZ...feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu7h...feature=related These seem rather stupid, but watch them for clues. Also, if any of you have Limewire, download 'Loose Change' Editions 1 and 2. These are full length documentaries about the 9/11. They are about 700MB each. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora Posted January 1, 2008 Share Posted January 1, 2008 Yeah, I watched it. I hate all these people who try convincing others it was some conspiracy (nothing personal). Why the hell must everything be a conspiracy? Yeah right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris82 Posted January 1, 2008 Share Posted January 1, 2008 Yes, I called George Bush and he said 911 was a government-run conspiracy. He also says you should keep wasting your life trying to figure it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanoutlaw Posted January 1, 2008 Share Posted January 1, 2008 I'm not even going to dignify this w/ an answer. Please kids, don't drink the bong water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Gorilla Posted January 1, 2008 Share Posted January 1, 2008 Hmph, everyone knows the the terrorists were behind it all, why so many conspiracies, next I suppose people will suspect Parliament behind the London Bombings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanoutlaw Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Or how about when Roosevelt & Churchill made up the Nazis back in the late '30s? (I will dignify Alucardo w/ a response) BTW, aznn do you have anything from a RELIABLE source? I didn't bother then I saw all your links were to YouTube. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrLlamaLlama Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 So, the government are crying wolf? So when the REAL terrorists strike, we'll all be like 'lol, that crazy government again ' Or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitsune Inferno Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 (edited) al-Qaeda performed the September 11 attacks. They admitted to it. There's evidence that they were behind it. Hell, they attacked the towers years before 9/11. There is no effin' conspiracy. Edited January 2, 2008 by TEC 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Yeah, Al-Qaeda had the motive, the possibility and a confession., what else do people want? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azn Posted January 2, 2008 Author Share Posted January 2, 2008 (edited) Well sorry...It just seems odd that an explosion of aircraft fuel can bring a 110-storey skyscraper down... Edited January 2, 2008 by aznn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Well sorry...It just seems odd that an explosion of aircraft fuel can bring a 110-storey skyscraper down... Odd? I'm amazed that they stood for such a long time. It's not just an explession. It's a full aircraft damaging the support collums and after that a big fire that weakens the rest of the supporting collums so they can't stand the huge strain of weight. Eventually, it would collapse. Make a structure with little sticks. A stable one. And then set it on fire some where 3/4 of the structure. The top will collapse giving to much strain the the bottom part of the structure thus making a whole structure collapse. It's only makes sense.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connor Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 ...And what would be the point of the government destroying their own cities and killing thousands of innocent people? Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azn Posted January 2, 2008 Author Share Posted January 2, 2008 Some believe 9/11 was a pretext so Bush could send troops into Iraq, invade the country and steal the Oil supplies, but that's one theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connor Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 ...Can't he just do that anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azn Posted January 2, 2008 Author Share Posted January 2, 2008 (edited) A Pretext. Does he have the rights to just go up and dig up the oil in Iraq? No. He made the pretext then blamed Al Queda, then accused them of hiding weapons...and when he found none...then why the hell are American troops still in Iraq? While he was at it he could help himself to the Oil. Edited January 2, 2008 by aznn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris82 Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 The point of going into Iraq was to remove a dangerous dictator, which was a successful operation. Troops remain in Iraq to train the Iraqi government/army incase terrorists try to take over when the troops leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty Harry Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 And Santa Klaus is also a government run conspiracy for you to give big money to business men. Ya Rly...(sarcasm). Does the US governemt kill Americans, yes, is it in America, no, it's in Iraq. Everyone knows Al-Qaeda were the organisation behind this. America should stop to try to save the world. They did a big mess messing the world up, while earning money with it. Now they are trying to clean the world AND EARNING MONEY WITH IT. Just like Al Gore and his "Inconvenient Truth". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandora Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 At least there is some country in the world trying to rid us of terrorists. Can't expect everything to always go according to plan you know. And Bush doesn't have the might to place bombs in the WTC. Other then that. How would he keep hundreds of people quiet who would work on that operation. Who who is sane would commit suicide by crashing such plane into the building so Bush could invade some country and make the attack look like a terrorist attack. Come on.. Just think for a second. Don't listen to some drop-out kid who thinks he knows it all (there is a reason why he's a drop-out you know. Probably not exactly the brightest guy you'll come across in your life) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherman Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 Well, one thing I didn't really understand is when people said there was rigged bombs. Apparently it crumbled at the top, but no one wants to believe that'd happen, because it's "impossible." I'd imagine when it struck, there was a huge vibration and such. So unless you've actually seen a plane hit a building (of that scale), yeah. But on the other side of the fence, why do we have those firefighters and policemen saying it was an inside job? Wouldn't they be the first to know, seeing they were the ones that had to rescue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanoutlaw Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 FDNY lost something like half their people in the 9/11 attacks, NYPD also took a hell of a hit. I'd expect their view to be a little distorted in light of that. Not counting Japan's half-assed balloon bombs & shelling an uninhabited beach in WWII, this was the first direct attack on US soil since the war of 1812. We had gotten the mind set that no one could ever do it & 9/11 shattered that, people still deny it could happen here. Okay, simplest terms on how they took down the towers. Al-Queefa (not worth my time to find correct spelling) specifically stole planes destined for long trips to ensure they had full fuel tanks. This results in a huge fire, which makes heat. In turn the heat weakens the steel framework inside the concrete. The weight of all the structure causes the walls in the impact area to give way & everything above drops 10 feet (1 floor). This weakens the walls below & basically turns everything above the impact into a giant jackhammer. Simple physics. The impact wasn't what brought down the towers, they stood for some time afterwards. It was the fire that did it. This is what bin lauden tried to accomplish in '92 w/ the Ryder truck in the basement garage of the WTC, but failed to generate a sufficient fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charger Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 (edited) Only the Pentagon gives out a lot, If you take a look at the damage, its to little to be a full plane. It actually does look like a Missile was the cause. But I don't like to think about stuff like that... It doesn't interest me. Also a few months ago, there was a report about the U.S Bombing one of their cities so they can have a reason to attack Cuba. I saw this on the news a few months ago, it was pretty interesting. Edited January 2, 2008 by Charger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanoutlaw Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 The Pentagon is a much shorter structure so the damage would be contained to the impact area. It was also designed to be the US military headquarters so I would expect it to be a little sturdier than most buildings. Besides, a jetliner going 400 MPH sounds a lot like a missile, minus the warhead. Cuba, for what? Mambo music & pre 1958 American cars? I'm sure it's a nice place to visit & I like the few Cubans I've met (one involved in the Bay of Pigs incident), but what could they possibly have to risk a war over? In the coming years I expect relations to be officially re-opened between Cuba & the US. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charger Posted January 2, 2008 Share Posted January 2, 2008 The Pentagon is a much shorter structure so the damage would be contained to the impact area. It was also designed to be the US military headquarters so I would expect it to be a little sturdier than most buildings. Besides, a jetliner going 400 MPH sounds a lot like a missile, minus the warhead. Cuba, for what? Mambo music & pre 1958 American cars? I'm sure it's a nice place to visit & I like the few Cubans I've met (one involved in the Bay of Pigs incident), but what could they possibly have to risk a war over? In the coming years I expect relations to be officially re-opened between Cuba & the US. It was suppose to happen around the 1940's. Not during these times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connor Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 Why do people bother even reading this topic...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raymond Posted January 3, 2008 Share Posted January 3, 2008 seriously this is the serious chat...at here we discuss the serious things that happened you and the world normally does US has cuban gangsters? i really want to know because somebody said it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now